Changes between Version 45 and Version 46 of DevelopersCommittee/Agenda/2013-06-18
- Timestamp:
- 2013-05-15T17:42:58+02:00 (11 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
DevelopersCommittee/Agenda/2013-06-18
v45 v46 13 13 12:30 Opening of the meeting ( ) 14 14 15 12:45 – 2:00 Brief presentation of available documents:10 mn for each: CMCC ( ) , CNRS ( ), INGV (P. Oddo), Mercator (Y. Drillet), !MetOffice ( ), NERC-NOC ( ) , others: CONCEPTS & CCCma, Canada ( )15 12:45 – 2:00 '''Brief presentation of available documents: '''10 mn for each: CMCC ( ) , CNRS ( ), INGV (P. Oddo), Mercator (Y. Drillet), !MetOffice ( ), NERC-NOC ( ) , others: CONCEPTS & CCCma, Canada ( ) 16 16 17 2:00 – 2:20 Proposed presentations: About Gung-Ho (Nigel Wood – Met Office) 17 2:00 – 2:20 Proposed presentations: 18 19 '''About Gung-Ho '''(Nigel Wood – Met Office) 18 20 19 21 2:20 – 3:00 Coffee Break 20 22 21 3:00 – 4:30 Discussion on documents and additional contributions23 3:00 – 4:30 '''Discussion on documents and additional contributions''' 22 24 23 25 4:30 – 6:00 Thematic discussions, proposed sessions:[[BR]][[BR]]'''Session 1: NEMO platform: seamless to what extend?''' (Leaders: J. Holt and P. Marsaleix) With ORCA12 (global 1/12°) are we reaching an optimal level? Should we continue moving towards higher resolutions or should we stop there and work in a probabilistic way to quantify errors?[[BR]]In the future, is the NEMO platform expected to be modelling all time and space scales from global to coastal (up to rivers, tide banks, module sedimentary module, etc…) or is there a boundary in small scales (coastal) and associated processes where NEMO should stop, and/or be properly connected to another modelling platform?'''''''''''