Changes between Version 60 and Version 61 of DevelopersCommittee/Agenda/2013-06-18
- Timestamp:
- 2013-05-18T09:11:53+02:00 (11 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
DevelopersCommittee/Agenda/2013-06-18
v60 v61 15 15 12:45 – 2:00 '''Brief presentation of available documents: '''10 mn for each: CMCC (tbd) , CNRS (tbd), INGV (P. Oddo), Mercator (Y. Drillet), !MetOffice (tbd), NERC-NOC (tbd) , others: CONCEPTS & CCCma, Canada (tbd) 16 16 17 2:00 – 2:20 Proposed presentations: 17 2:00 – 2:20 Proposed presentations:'''[[BR]] About Gung-Ho ''' (Nigel Wood – Met Office) 18 18 19 ''' About Gung-Ho ''' (Nigel Wood – Met Office) 19 2:20 – 2:50 Coffee Break 20 20 21 2: 20 – 3:00 Coffee Break21 2:50 – 4:15 '''Discussion on documents and additional contributions''' 22 22 23 3:00 – 4:30 '''Discussion on documents and additional contributions''' 24 25 4:30 – 6:00 Thematic discussions, proposed sessions:[[BR]][[BR]]'''Session 1: NEMO platform: seamless to what extend?''' (Leaders: J. Holt and P. Marsaleix) With ORCA12 (global 1/12°) are we reaching an optimal level? Should we continue moving towards higher resolutions or should we stop there and work in a probabilistic way to quantify errors?[[BR]]In the future, is the NEMO platform expected to be modelling all time and space scales from global to coastal (up to rivers, tide banks, module sedimentary module, etc…) or is there a boundary in small scales (coastal) and associated processes where NEMO should stop, and/or be properly connected to another modelling platform?''''''''''' 23 4:15 – 6:15 Thematic discussions, proposed sessions:[[BR]][[BR]]'''Session 1: NEMO platform: seamless to what extend?''' (Leaders: J. Holt and P. Marsaleix) With ORCA12 (global 1/12°) are we reaching an optimal level? Should we continue moving towards higher resolutions or should we stop there and work in a probabilistic way to quantify errors?[[BR]]In the future, is the NEMO platform expected to be modelling all time and space scales from global to coastal (up to rivers, tide banks, module sedimentary module, etc…) or is there a boundary in small scales (coastal) and associated processes where NEMO should stop, and/or be properly connected to another modelling platform?''''''''''' 26 24 27 25 '''Session 2: New dynamical cores, HPC and science ''' (Leader: S. Masson) 28 26 29 6:30 Cocktail 27 '''Session 3: NEMO validation and contours of user support: '''Although having all possible options working all the time is the NEMO user's dream, it is not possible. What is needed and where does the System Team stops? [6:30 (Leader : tbd)] 28 29 6:30 Cocktail 30 30 31 31 '''Wednesday 19 June:''' … … 33 33 9:00 – 10:30 Thematic discussions (cont’): 34 34 35 '''Session 3: Is AGRIF a major feature of NEMO? '''(Leader: L. Debreu & tbd) If answer is yes, what is needed in mid-term to have it as a reliable component?35 '''Session 4: Is AGRIF a major feature of NEMO? '''(Leader: L. Debreu & tbd) If answer is yes, what is needed in mid-term to have it as a reliable component? 36 36 37 '''Session 4: Sea-ice and biogeochemical components: '''which level of flexibility should we target to take efficiently in account the panel of available and used components for sea-ice (NEMO-LIM, CICE, GELATO…) and for biogeochemistry (NEMO-TOP, BFM, MEDUSA…)? (Leader: tbd)37 '''Session 5: Sea-ice and biogeochemical components: '''which level of flexibility should we target to take efficiently in account the panel of available and used components for sea-ice (NEMO-LIM, CICE, GELATO…) and for biogeochemistry (NEMO-TOP, BFM, MEDUSA…)? (Leader: tbd) 38 38 39 '''Session 5: Contours and limits of the assimilation component of NEMO''' (Leader: tbd)39 '''Session 6: Contours and limits of the assimilation component of NEMO''' (Leader: tbd) 40 40 41 41 10:30 – 11:00 Coffee break[[BR]][[BR]]11:00 -12:00 ''' Conclusions “on the fly” '''by a group including CMCC(tbd), CNRS(tbd), INGV(tbd), Mercator(tbd), Met-Office(tbd), NERC-NOC(tbd):Suggestions of the committee: for the summary of final document, how to build NEMO’s roadmap for the next 10 years?[[BR]]Suggestions to Steering Committee for next steps (writing and discussing the final document) … … 67 67 || Guarnieri || Antonio || yes || yes || yes || || || cons. exp. || 68 68 || Bricaud || Clement || yes || yes || yes || || || Devcom - SysTeam || 69 || Drillet || Yann || yes || yes || yes || 9:00 || 18:00|| cons. exp. ||69 || Drillet || Yann || yes || yes || yes || 9:00 || 18:00 || cons. exp. || 70 70 || Biastoch || Arne || yes || yes || yes || || || Invitee || 71 71 || Iovino || Dorotea || yes || yes || yes || || || cons. exp. || … … 78 78 || Joussaume || Sylvie || yes || yes || no || || || Steering Committee || 79 79 || Debreu || Laurent || yes || yes || yes || !9:00 || !18:00 || Invitee || 80 || Benshila ||Rachid ||yes || yes|| yes||Adaptative||Adaptative ||SysTeam ||81 || Vancoppenolle ||Martin ||yes || yes|| No|||| ||SysTeam ||82 || Pickles ||Stephen ||yes ||yes ||yes || || ||Invitee ||80 || Benshila || Rachid || yes || yes || yes || Adaptative || Adaptative || SysTeam || 81 || Vancoppenolle || Martin || yes || yes || No || || || SysTeam || 82 || Pickles || Stephen || yes || yes || yes || || || Invitee || 83 83 || || || || || || || || || 84 84 || || || || || || || || ||
