Version 9 (modified by gm, 9 years ago) (diff)

Last edited Timestamp?


Author : Gurvan Madec

Ticket : #927

Branch : 2012/dev_r3309_LOCEAN12_Ediag


LOCEAN .12 - Energy diagnostics

Motivation: output 3D trends of tracers, momentum, kinetic energy and potential energy.
Status : the extraction of trends terms exists, but not the 3D output of the trends
Main tasks :

(1) implement the 3D output of tracers and momentum trends using iom_put
(2) compute and output the 3D trends of PE and KE
(3) validatation + documentation

Science Reviewer: NOCS guy?
System Reviewer: NOCS guy?
Deadline: spring 2012
Priority: high
Depends on: gurvan disponibilities
Principal Investigator : Gurvan Madec and Simona Flavoni (simona.flavoni@…)

Detail of the implementation

Step I : add the 3D output

trdmod_oce module

logical flags added in namlist namtrd which now controls what is done with the trends.
All the types of treatment of a given trend are available at the same time. The memory requirement will only increase due to the time averaged arrays defined in IOM.

   LOGICAL , PUBLIC  ::   ln_3D_trd_d   = .FALSE.         !: (T) 3D momentum              trends or (F) not
   LOGICAL , PUBLIC  ::   ln_3D_trd_t   = .FALSE.         !: (T) 3D tracer               trends or (F) not
   LOGICAL , PUBLIC  ::   ln_PE_trd     = .FALSE.         !: (T) 3D Potential Energy     trends or (F) not
   LOGICAL , PUBLIC  ::   ln_KE_trd     = .FALSE.         !: (T) 3D Kinetic   Energy     trends or (F) not
   LOGICAL , PUBLIC  ::   ln_vor_trd    = .FALSE.         !: (T) 3D barotropic vorticity trends or (F) not
   LOGICAL , PUBLIC  ::   ln_glo_trd    = .FALSE.         !: (T) global domain averaged diag for T, T^2, KE, and PE
   LOGICAL , PUBLIC  ::   ln_ML_trd_t   = .FALSE.         !: (T) 2D tracer   trends averaged over the mixed layer 
   LOGICAL , PUBLIC  ::   ln_ML_trd_d   = .FALSE.         !: (T) 2D momentum trends averaged over the mixed layer 


trdtra module

Add a systematic mask of the trend.
Change the comments to better describe the purpose of this module. Its purpose is:

'TRA' case: to regroup T & S trends and send them to trd_mod, with, in case of advection, transform the incoming advective fluxes into advctive trend (U.grad[T])
'TRC' case: send trend to ted_mod_trc, with, in case of advection, transform the incoming advective fluxes into advective trend
all cases : mask the trend (==⇒>> PROBABLY add in the module a lbc_lnk so that the trend is defined everywhere)


dynadv_cen2 and _ubs modules

change jpdyn_trd_had into jpdyn_trd_keg. Now in flux form _keg corresponds to the horizontal advection trends and _rvo to the metric terms

dynnxt module

add the output using mom of the total den trend (except asselin time filter) ("utrd_tot", "vtrd_tot") and of the asselin time filter trend ("utrd_atf", "vtrd_atf") but with a shift by one time step

dynvor and trdvor modules

suppress the call to trd_mod in the jpdyn_trd_dat case (computation of beta.V) add add the calculation of beta.V term in 'trdvor' in jpvor_pvo case

trdmod module

1- introduce the new logical namelist parameters
2- introduce new subroutines : trd_budget : computation of the domain averaged T,T2, PE, KE trends formerly computes in trd_mod routine)
trd_3Diom: output of the 3D trends using IOM

NB problems to be solved: vvl case for tracer sad trends ; flux form case for had (keg) and zad momentum trends

Pending issues :

add separate modules for each option …

create the momentum diag over the ML

create the 3D trends for KE and PE


Testing

Testing could consider (where appropriate) other configurations in addition to NVTK].

NVTK Tested'''YES/NO'''
Other model configurations'''YES/NO'''
Processor configurations tested[ Enter processor configs tested here ]
If adding new functionality please confirm that the
New code doesn't change results when it is switched off
and ''works'' when switched on
'''YES/NO/NA'''

(Answering UNSURE is likely to generate further questions from reviewers.)

'Please add further summary details here'

  • Processor configurations tested
  • etc——

Bit Comparability

Does this change preserve answers in your tested standard configurations (to the last bit) ?'''YES/NO '''
Does this change bit compare across various processor configurations. (1xM, Nx1 and MxN are recommended)'''YES/NO'''
Is this change expected to preserve answers in all possible model configurations?'''YES/NO'''
Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics?
,,''Preserving answers in model runs does not necessarily imply preserved diagnostics. ''
'''YES/NO'''

If you answered '''NO''' to any of the above, please provide further details:

  • Which routine(s) are causing the difference?
  • Why the changes are not protected by a logical switch or new section-version
  • What is needed to achieve regression with the previous model release (e.g. a regression branch, hand-edits etc). If this is not possible, explain why not.
  • What do you expect to see occur in the test harness jobs?
  • Which diagnostics have you altered and why have they changed?Please add details here……..

System Changes

Does your change alter namelists?'''YES/NO '''
Does your change require a change in compiler options?'''YES/NO '''

If any of these apply, please document the changes required here…….


Resources

''Please ''summarize'' any changes in runtime or memory use caused by this change……''


IPR issues

Has the code been wholly (100%) produced by NEMO developers staff working exclusively on NEMO?'''YES/ NO '''

If No:

  • Identify the collaboration agreement details
  • Ensure the code routine header is in accordance with the agreement, (Copyright/Redistribution? etc).Add further details here if required……….