Version 2 (modified by weaver, 6 years ago) (diff)

Last edited Timestamp?

For completion by the Sci/Tech/Code? reviewer

Reviewer: [ Anthony Weaver ]

Ticket Details, Documentation and Code changes

Do you understand the area of code being altered and the reasoning why it is being altered?YES
Do the proposed code changes correspond with the stated reason for the change?YES
Is the in-line documentation accurate and sufficient?YES
Do the code changes comply with NEMO coding standards?NOT ENTIRELY
Is the Ticket documented with sufficient detail for others to understand the impact of the change?YES
Does any corresponding external documentation require updating?YES
If yes, which docs and have the updates been drafted?OBS, not sure
Are namelist changes required for this change?NO
If yes, have they been done?NA
Has a completed Ticket Summary template been appended to the ticket to aid code reviewsYES
Does this summary correspond with your understanding of the full ticket?YES

Ticket, Documentation and Code comments

Add specific Ticket, Documentation and code comments here


Has the NVTK and other jobs been tested with this change?YES
Have the required bit comparability tests been run?YES
Can this change be shown to have a null impact? (if option not selected)YES
If no, is reason for the change valid/understood?NA
If no, ensure that the ticket details the impact this change will have on model configurations .NA
Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics?NO
If no, is reason for the change valid/understood?YES
Are there significant changes in run time/memory?YES

Testing Comments

Add specific testing comments here

Code Review

Do the code changes comply with NEMO coding standards?NOT ENTIRELY
Are code changes consistent with the design of NEMO?YES
Is the code free of unwanted TABs?HAVE NOT CHECKED
Has the code been wholly (100%) produced by NEMO developers working on NEMO?YES
If no, ensure collaboration agreement has been added to the ticket keywords

Add specific code comments or suggested alterations here.

  • Fix various alignment and indentation issues (eg, & for line continuation should be 3 spaces in from previous line)
  • Group the local declarations by same type.
  • Separate the Argument and local declarations by a space
  • The local INTEGER array v_indic uses a naming convention for global real variables. The array name should start with an "i".

Review Summary

The interpolation in the observation operators has been made available with s-coordinates. This work has essentially involved reversing the order of the horizontal-vertical interpolation compared to what is done in z-coordinates. The code has been successfully tested.

Approval for the trunk

YES, after fixing the minor issues with code format above.

The code reviewer may approve the change for the NEMO trunk when:

  1. their requests/comments have been addressed satisfactorily.
  2. the above check-list has been completed.

or the code reviewer may choose to reject & assign the change back to the code author.