Changes between Version 33 and Version 34 of ticket/1851/General


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2017-03-01T16:29:50+01:00 (4 years ago)
Author:
frrh
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ticket/1851/General

    v33 v34  
    239239The only differences are in the qsr_mean values which are uniformly 15 in one file and 95 in the other. All other fields are identical. So this really is a pointless thing to have in the restarts and is just confusing matters by being no reproducible. Ideally we'd ditch it, especially as the NEMO trunk has subsequently completely rewritten this routine, including correcting the setting of llnew.  
    240240 
    241   
    242   
    243  
    244  
    245  
     241Extensive excruciatingly long winded and painstaking use of glob_sub in NEMO leads us to the fact that tsa diverges after the call to sbc_tsc.  
     242 
     243Examining contributing things in sbc_tsc leads us to sfx (salt flux due to melting/freezing) and qns (non solar heat flux).  
     244 
     245These in turn seems to lead us to sbcice_cice which seems to set these up. That in turn suggests CICE or CICE-NEMO coupling is implicated.  
     246 
     247|Now the XCS has crashed everything, so while waiting for that to be sorted out I look at the differences in CICE branches between the coupled and stand alone cases - and there are several! Far too many for comfort or to ignore: 
     248 
     249Coupled model CICE branches; 
     250{{{ 
     251 
     252branches/dev/frbe/vn5.1.2_sal_dep_frz_fix@1126 
     253branches/dev/frrh/vn5.1.2_tripole_fix@1237 
     254 
     255branches/dev/frsy/vn5.1.2_netcdf4_output@1072 
     256branches/dev/hadax/r1205_SIMIP_GSI8@1273 
     257branches/dev/hadci/vn5.1.2_land_suppression@1122 
     258branches/dev/hadjs/vn5.1.2_avoid_NEMO_units@1059 
     259branches/dev/hadjs/vn5.1.2_fix_mpond_init_bug@1065 
     260branches/dev/hadjs/vn5.1.2_sea_ice_salinity@1061 
     261branches/dev/mandrej/vn5.1.2_mpi_update@1243 
     262branches/test/hadjs/vn5.1.2_dragio_change@1152 
     263 
     264}}}   
     265  
     266Non coupled model CICE branches: 
     267{{{ 
     268branches/dev/frbe/vn5.1.2_GSI7_CCSM3_meltponds@1114 
     269branches/dev/frbe/vn5.1.2_sal_dep_frz_fix@1126 
     270branches/dev/frrh/vn5.1.2_tripole_fix@1237 
     271branches/dev/frsy/vn5.1.2_fix_GSI6_constants_forced_ocean_ice@1070 
     272branches/dev/frsy/vn5.1.2_netcdf4_output@1072 
     273branches/dev/hadax/vn5.1.2_GSI8@1141 
     274branches/dev/hadci/vn5.1.2_land_suppression@1122 
     275branches/dev/hadjs/vn5.1.2_avoid_NEMO_units@1059 
     276branches/dev/hadjs/vn5.1.2_fix_mpond_init_bug@1065 
     277branches/dev/hadjs/vn5.1.2_sea_ice_salinity@1061 
     278}}} 
     279  
     280 
     281So the coupled case has extra branches: 
     282{{{ 
     283branches/dev/hadax/r1205_SIMIP_GSI8@1273 
     284branches/dev/mandrej/vn5.1.2_mpi_update@1243 
     285branches/test/hadjs/vn5.1.2_dragio_change@1152 
     286}}} 
     287 
     288WHile it does not contain 
     289{{{ 
     290branches/dev/frbe/vn5.1.2_GSI7_CCSM3_meltponds@1114 
     291branches/dev/frsy/vn5.1.2_fix_GSI6_constants_forced_ocean_ice@1070 
     292branches/dev/hadax/vn5.1.2_GSI8@1141 
     293}}}