Changes between Version 46 and Version 47 of ticket/1851/General

Timestamp:

2017-03-07T12:51:52+01:00 (7 years ago)

Author:

frrh

Comment:

--

ticket/1851/General

@@ -377 +377 @@
 
 He also says that iswabs is dependent on fswint. I have apparently consistent values of fswint throughout the model - it's zero. Which may explain why iswabs ends up as zero on subsequent timesteps but if it's initialised in a different way then we have junk or at least unwanted values.
+
+This takes us back yet again to ice_shortwave and the line
+   Iswabs(i,j,k) = fswpen(i,j) * (trantop(i,j)-tranbot(i,j))
+in routine absorbed_solar. 
+
+So fswpen, trantop and tranbot definitely contribute to the initial value. Print these out and at the same time initialise Iswabs to zero here and see what happens. 
+
+