New URL for NEMO forge!   http://forge.nemo-ocean.eu

Since March 2022 along with NEMO 4.2 release, the code development moved to a self-hosted GitLab.
This present forge is now archived and remained online for history.
user/poddo/atm_press_flt (diff) – NEMO

Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of user/poddo/atm_press_flt


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2011-10-31T15:43:59+01:00 (12 years ago)
Author:
poddo
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • user/poddo/atm_press_flt

    v1 v2  
    66 
    77---- 
    8 == Introduction == 
    9 Starting from NEMO_3.3 release the OPA component of the system includes also the possibility to force the model using the Atmospheric pressure filed provided externally. The code has been developed by MERCATOR and tested using the time-splitting option. The main goal of this work is to test the usage of Atmospheric pressure Forcing using the filtered free surface formulation. Originally it has been planned also to study the influence of different lateral open boundary condition parameterizations, however due to the decision to froze the OBC and BDY modules developments until a merge of the two modules will be completed the sensitivity study of the LOBC has been postponed. [[Image()]] 
     8== Experiment set-up == 
     9Basic NEMO model configuration is described in Oddo et al. 2009. Model domain covers the whole Mediterranean Sea plus a “large” Atlantic box [[Image(fig01_tmp.png)]], where the model is nested with the Global ¼ Degree MERCATOR operational model. External Lateral Open Boundary Condition data are monthly climatology obtained from 10 year global experiment.  
     10The main difference with standard NEMO code concerns the volume conservation. In Standard OPA code, in case of filtered free surface option, the volume conservation is imposed. In the present version of the model the Mass/Volume transport across the model domain lateral open boundaries is driven by a generalized Flather’s algoritm (Oddo et al. 2008) see eq. 3 in Odo et al 2010. 
     11Four different experiment have been performed in order to understand the differences in using the Atmospherci pressure forcing in case of time-splitting and filtered free surface formulation. 
     12EXP1 reproduces the Oddo et al 2010, experiment with NEMO_3.3.1, so it has the filtered free surface formulation and no atmospheric pressure (AP) 
     13EXP2 is the same of EXP1 plus the introduction of the AP. 
     14EXP3 is the same model step-up of EXP1 but with time-splitting option. 
     15EXP4 is EXP3 plus the introduction of the AP forcing. 
    1016 
    11 == Experiment set-up == 
     17 
    1218== Results and Discussion == 
     19 
    1320== Conclusions == 
     21 
    1422== Bibliography == 
    15 ---- 
     23 
     24 
     25 
     26P. Oddo and N. Pinardi. Lateral open boundary conditions for nested limited area models: A scale selective approach. Ocean Modelling Volume 20, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 134-156 
     27 
     28P. Oddo, M. Adani, N. Pinardi, C. Fratianni, M. Tonani, and D. Pettenuzzo. A nested Atlantic-Mediterranean Sea general circulation model for operational forecasting. Ocean Sci., 5, 461-473, 2009