Changes between Version 17 and Version 18 of DevelopmentActivities/CMIP6/DevelopmentsCMIP6/soil_physic


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2015-02-26T15:16:43+01:00 (9 years ago)
Author:
jgipsl
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • DevelopmentActivities/CMIP6/DevelopmentsCMIP6/soil_physic

    v17 v18  
    1 === GROUP and Objectives === 
     1[[PageOutline]]  
     2 
     3= GROUP and Objectives = 
    24 
    35 - Persons: Frederique, Agnes, Jan, Catherine, Fuxing, Tao, Philippe P., Jean Louis, ? 
     
    1618 - Remarks : The agreement and the details of such roadmap should be done; Most likely we need to separate the different TASKs with a different group of people for each?  
    1719 
    18 === Discussions === 
    19  
    20 '''Jan Polcher, 13/01/15 (mail)''' 
     20= Discussions = 
     21 
     22== Jan Polcher, 13/01/15 (mail) == 
    2123 
    2224après notre discussion cet après-midi j'ai un peu réfléchi à comment "merger" les 4 points de Philippe dans le trunk, tout en permettant à tout le monde de suivre ce qui se passe et donc de construire une confiance commune dans ces changements. 
     
    3537Pour réaliser ce plan je suis disposé à travailler avec Fuxing et Thao sur les étapes 1 et 2. Je ne peux pas quantifier le travail pour chaque étape, mais une semaine me semble un bon first-guess. Je pense que pour la neige ce sera un peu plus long. Mais comme cela vient en second on peut préparer les choses en amont.  
    3638 
    37 '''Philipe Peylin, 17/01/15 (mail)''' 
     39== Philipe Peylin, 17/01/15 (mail) == 
    3840 
    3941Concernant la proposition de Jan: 
     
    4143- Ensuite pour le point 2 et 4, personnellement j'aurais traiter cela ensemble (mais je ne suis pas le plus compétent pour juger de l'intéret de séparer) 
    4244 
    43 '''Agnès Ducharne, 23/01/15 (mail)''' 
     45== Agnès Ducharne, 23/01/15 (mail) == 
    4446 
    4547My opinion is that the main challenges are :[[BR]] 
     
    7880c) this still needs to be assessed, and we need to do it for CMIP6.v1 if we want to activate soil freezing. 
    7981 
    80 '''Summary of a talk between Fuxing Wang and Aaron Boone at the AMA2015 in Toulouse''' 
     82== Summary of a talk between Fuxing Wang and Aaron Boone at the AMA2015 in Toulouse == 
    8183 
    8284(1) Potential problem with the too deep soil depth: A. BOONE said that not only the annual mean discharge changes by using very deep soil layers, the seasonal cycles of discharge (phase and amplitude) are changed a lot by using very deep soil layers in ISBA model. And the second situation may be more serious that the first problem. It seems the hydrology model in MPI also has this problem mentioned by A. BOONE. Currently, the soil depth is 2-3m (changing for different regions) for hydrology,and it is 12m for thermal (constant) in ISBA model. The soil moistures below 2-3m are computed by Darcy's law. 
     
    8991(3) 1st layer depth It is 1cm for the 1st soil layer in ISBA. A. BOONE's opinion is that the 1mm soil depth is too thin, and A. BOONE's suggested it better to use at least 1 cm for the 1st layer. 
    9092 
    91 '''Jan Polcher, 26/01/15 (mail)''' to Agnès 23/01/15 
     93== Jan Polcher, 26/01/15 (mail) to Agnès 23/01/15 == 
    9294 
    9395thank you for this analysis ... which I totally share. I will give you my feeling on a few of the points you raise : 
     
    108110For the snow, I am still waiting to see the equations to be used to coupled the bottom temperature of snow pack with the one of the soil. Once we have all the equations of the temperature diffusion (from the skin temperature to the bottom of the soil and through the snow pack) in implicit form, things should flow smoothly. 
    109111 
    110 '''Fuxing Wang, 26/01/15 (mail)''' 
     112== Fuxing Wang, 26/01/15 (mail) == 
    111113 
    112114(1) The depth. This should be configurable by the user as different applications will have different needs. We should code things so that each one can test the configuration which suits him/her best. 
     
    124126The bottom positions from top 4st to 6th layers are : 2.151cm, 4.497cm, 9.189cm. 
    125127 
    126 '''Frédérique Cheruy, 27/01/15 (mail)''' 
     128== Frédérique Cheruy, 27/01/15 (mail) == 
    127129 
    128130''About the optimal vertical discretization for W and T''[[BR]] 
     
    143145Whoever will work on that subject,  it would be good to know if the bare soil albedo maps prepared by Sebastian and team can be directly pluged into Orchidee-trunk or if we need to see with ISBA people, or to redo the work ourselves. 
    144146 
    145 '''Jan Polcher, 27/01/15 (mail)''' to F. Chéruy, 27/01/15 
     147== Jan Polcher, 27/01/15 (mail) to F. Chéruy, 27/01/15 == 
    146148 
    147149Je suis d'accord avec toi qu'il faudra définir la "configurabilité" des niveaux verticaux en fonction des différentes contraintes. Le nombre de nivaux sera sans doute un résultat plutôt qu'un paramètre. 
     
    151153C'est la même chose qui est fait dans LMDZ au pôle !  
    152154 
    153 '''Jan Polcher, 06/02/15 (mail)''' 
     155== Jan Polcher, 06/02/15 (mail) == 
    154156 
    155157I have given it some thought on how to specify the parameter in order to choose the common levels between hydrol and thermosoil. 
     
    172174So once we agree on the choice it can be implemented in the trunk.  
    173175 
    174 '''Agnès Ducharne, Fuxing Wang, Fréderique Chéruy, 06/02/15 (meeting)''' 
     176== Agnès Ducharne, Fuxing Wang, Fréderique Chéruy, 06/02/15 (meeting) == 
    175177 
    176178We had a skype meeting today about the soil discretization for water and T. We looked at three discretizations (D1: as in Trunk; D2: 8m for water and T, with the same 17 nodes, and the same location of the top 11 nodes as in D1 for water; D3: 2m for water as in D1 + assumption of uniform profile below, 8m for T as in D2, so that the two diffusion schemes use the same nodes in the top 2m) 
     
    183185 
    184186 
    185 '''== Frederique Cheruy after Skype meeting and discussion with Jan ( 7/02/2015) ==''' 
     187== Frederique Cheruy after Skype meeting and discussion with Jan ( 7/02/2015) == 
    186188 
    187189* Spin-up and off-line simulations. 
     
    194196 
    195197 
    196 '''  Fuxing Wang, Fréderique Chéruy, Agnès Ducharne, Jan Polcher, Philippe Peylin, Jean-Louis DUFRESNE, et al. 11/02/2015 (mail)''' 
     198== Fuxing Wang, Fréderique Chéruy, Agnès Ducharne, Jan Polcher, Philippe Peylin, Jean-Louis DUFRESNE, et al. 11/02/2015 (mail) == 
    197199 '''Updated history''': 17/02/2015[[BR]] 
    198200 
     
    227229  See Table 1: [https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/attachment/wiki/Meetings/CMIP6/Physic/Table1_oscillations_LMDZOR.pdf​] [[BR]] 
    228230 
    229 '''''== Frederique Cheruy Summary (11/02/2015)''' 
     231== Frederique Cheruy Summary (11/02/2015) == 
    230232 
    231233 
     
    252254 
    253255 
    254 ''''''Mail JLD''''''  
    255  
    256  
     256== Mail JLD == 
    257257Hi Frederic, 
    258258