Changes between Version 48 and Version 49 of DevelopmentActivities/CMIP6/DevelopmentsCMIP6/soil_physic


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2015-06-03T16:57:07+02:00 (9 years ago)
Author:
fwang
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • DevelopmentActivities/CMIP6/DevelopmentsCMIP6/soil_physic

    v48 v49  
    552552 https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/attachment/wiki/Meetings/CMIP6/Physic/Sarah_debits-ob-yenesi-lena.pdf​ [[BR]] 
    553553 
     554 To understand the reason of the low hydrographs in VD1, several sensitivity tests were compared (1 year):[[BR]] 
     555 https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/attachment/wiki/Meetings/CMIP6/Physic/vd1_vd2_vd3_resol.pdf​​ [[BR]] 
     556 0: CRU-NCEP twodeg forcing (v5.3.2), no stomate (the VD1 we did)[[BR]] 
     557 1: CRU-NCEP twodeg forcing (v5.3.2), with stomate  ==> stomate affects Runoff + Drainage and E (Figs.a-d).[[BR]] 
     558 2: CRU-NCEP halfdeg forcing (v5.3.2), with stomate ==> it is not likely forcing resolution affects R+D and E significantly (Figs.e-h).[[BR]] 
     559 3: WFDEI halfdeg forcing,  with stomate            ==> The main factor (the different precipitation of CRUNCEP and WFDEI) that affects the R+D and E (Figs.i-l).[[BR]] 
     560 
    554561(5) The snow mass by ORCHIDEE [[BR]] 
    555562 Comparing over the last decades of each VDs.[[BR]]