Changes between Version 94 and Version 95 of DevelopmentActivities/ORCHIDEE-CNP


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2016-03-15T13:48:08+01:00 (8 years ago)
Author:
dgoll
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • DevelopmentActivities/ORCHIDEE-CNP

    v94 v95  
    114114== 5.0 unresolved Issues == 
    115115 
    116 === MAJOR ISSUE: vegetation runs full of labile carbon === 
    117 The burning of excess labile carbon and reserve carbon is not like in OCN. The increase in autotrophic respiration when labile carbon stocks get unrealistic high is deactivated by DOFOCO team. 
    118 When using nutrient this is not acceptable, as vegetation runs full of sugar under nutrient stress on allocation. 
    119  
    120 === MAJOR ISSUE: the soil and litter CN ratios for spinup_analytic=== 
    121 The running average is too slow. We need to shorten the average window, like it is done for other longterm variables in ORCHIDEE. 
    122  
    123  
    124 === Reading in N inputs === 
    125 The variables storing the N inputs in the restart file are all undef. Not quite sure why. I set them all to zero. 
    126  
    127  
    128 === Soil type inconsistency in ORCHIDEE-CN-P === 
    129 The phosphorus model needs soil type specific parameters. Therefore, a new input routine is going to be written which reads in USDA soil orders. According to the soil order the parameter values are set for each grid box. 
    130  
    131 The problem is that ORCHIDEE already reads in fields of soil texture classes which were originally derived from soil orders. According to the soil texture classes, parameter related to soil hydrology are set. As the original data cannot be found anymore, ORCHIDEE will run with two independent sets of soil order specific parameters. Thereby inconsistencies between the phosphorus related parameters and the the hydrology related parameters can be introduced. The practice of reading in soil texture classes instead of soil orders is also problematic in respect of future developments and I suggest to change that. 
    132  
    133 === Stoichiometric flexibility === 
    134 Meyerholdt & Zaehle (2015) showed that model predictions best matched available data when the C:N ratios in all ecosystem pools except the wood pool were treated as flexible. 
    135 Thus, we should make the CNP ratio of wood fixed.  
    136  
    137  
    138 === Effect of nutrient stress on root/leaf ratio === 
    139 The effect of long-term nitrogen stress on the ratio between roots and leaves of O-CN is commented out in the ORCHIDEE-CN.  We should reintroduce the effect of nutrient stress on that ratio.  
    140 This task is hampered by my difficulties to understand how water stress is affecting the ratio in DOFOCO vs ORCHIDEE-CN. 
    141  
     116There are still unresolved issue with the model. They are listed here: [https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/wiki/DevelopmentActivities/ORCHIDEE-CNP/issues] 
    142117 
    143118----