Changes between Version 7 and Version 8 of DevelopmentActivities/subgrid


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2016-02-19T10:33:53+01:00 (8 years ago)
Author:
jryder
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • DevelopmentActivities/subgrid

    v7 v8  
    55This developement is motivated in part by research regarding differences in modelled characteristics when the 'mosaic' approach is applied within grid cells. ([https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/attachment/wiki/DevelopmentActivities/subgrid/Li%2C%20Arora%20-%202012%20-%20Effect%20of%20mosaic%20representation%20of%20vegetation%20in%20land%20surface%20schemes%20on%20simulated%20energy%20and%20carbon%20balances.pdf Li & Arora, 2012]; [https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/attachment/wiki/DevelopmentActivities/subgrid/bg-11-1021-2014.pdf Melton & Arora, 2014]) found that although there were differences of only 5% between grid averaged heat fluxes between the mosaic approach and composite approach are compared, differences of 30-40% were observed for grid averaged NPP, LAI, soil Carbon and vegetagion biomass. For high within-cell heterogeneity, differences were much greater in both instances. The mosaic versus composite effect has yet to be tested in a model on a global scale. 
    66 
    7 [[Image(retrait_slides_revision.009.png)]] 
     7 
     8== References == 
     9 
     10 
     11[https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/attachment/wiki/DevelopmentActivities/subgrid/Li%2C%20Arora%20-%202012%20-%20Effect%20of%20mosaic%20representation%20of%20vegetation%20in%20land%20surface%20schemes%20on%20simulated%20energy%20and%20carbon%20balances.pdf Li & Arora (2012)], 'Effect of mosaic representation of vegetation in land surface schemes on simulated energy and carbon balances' 
     12 
     13[https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/attachment/wiki/DevelopmentActivities/subgrid/bg-11-1021-2014.pdf Melton & Arora (2014)], 'Sub-grid scale representation of vegetation in global land surface schemes: implications for estimation of the terrestrial carbon sink'