Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of GroupActivities/CodeAvalaibilityPublication/ORCHIDEE_3_r6863


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2023-02-23T14:38:32+01:00 (17 months ago)
Author:
nvuilsce
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • GroupActivities/CodeAvalaibilityPublication/ORCHIDEE_3_r6863

    v1 v2  
    77 
    88 * '''Using free air CO2 enrichment data to constrain land surface model projections of the terrestrial carbon cycle''' by Nina Raoult, Louis-Axel Edouard-Rambaut, Nicolas Vuichard, Vladislav Bastrikov, Ann-Sofie Lansø, Bertrand Guenet, and Philippe Peylin, submitted 
    9  '''Abstract''' Predicting the responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon to future global change strongly relies on our ability to model accurately the underlying processes at a global scale. However, terrestrial biosphere models representing the carbon and nitrogen cycles and their interactions remain subject to large uncertainties, partly because of unknown or poorly constrained parameters. Data assimilation is a powerful tool that can be used to optimise these parameters by confronting the model with observations. In this paper, we identify sensitive model parameters from a recent version of the ORCHIDEE land surface model that includes the nitrogen cycle. These sensitive parameters include ones involved in parameterisations controlling the impact of the nitrogen cycle on the carbon cycle and, in particular, the limitation of photosynthesis due to leaf nitrogen availability. We optimise these ORCHIDEE parameters against carbon flux data collected on an extensive set of sites from the Fluxnet network. However, optimising against present-day observations does not automatically give us confidence in the future projections of the model, given that environmental conditions are likely to shift compared to present-day. Manipulation experiments give us a unique look into how the ecosystem may respond to future environmental changes. One such experiment, the Free Air CO2 Enrichment experiment, provides a unique opportunity to assess vegetation response to increasing CO2 by providing data at 
    10 ambient and elevated CO2 conditions. Therefore, to better capture the ecosystem response to increased CO2, we add the data from two FACE sites to our optimisations, in addition to the Fluxnet data. We use data from both CO2 conditions of the Free Air CO2 Enrichment experiment, which allows us to gain extra confidence in the model simulations using this set of parameters. We find that we are able to improve the magnitude of modelled productivity, although we are unable to correct the interannual variability. Using an idealised simulation experiment based on increasing atmospheric CO2 by 1% per year over 100 years, we find that the predicted production is higher for the optimised model than the prior model and that the model has different rates of change of the fertilisation effect of CO2 for the different forest types considered. 
     9 '''Abstract''' Predicting the responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon to future global change strongly relies on our ability to model accurately the underlying processes at a global scale. However, terrestrial biosphere models representing the carbon and nitrogen cycles and their interactions remain subject to large uncertainties, partly because of unknown or poorly constrained parameters. Data assimilation is a powerful tool that can be used to optimise these parameters by confronting the model with observations. In this paper, we identify sensitive model parameters from a recent version of the ORCHIDEE land surface model that includes the nitrogen cycle. These sensitive parameters include ones involved in parameterisations controlling the impact of the nitrogen cycle on the carbon cycle and, in particular, the limitation of photosynthesis due to leaf nitrogen availability. We optimise these ORCHIDEE parameters against carbon flux data collected on an extensive set of sites from the Fluxnet network. However, optimising against present-day observations does not automatically give us confidence in the future projections of the model, given that environmental conditions are likely to shift compared to present-day. Manipulation experiments give us a unique look into how the ecosystem may respond to future environmental changes. One such experiment, the Free Air CO2 Enrichment experiment, provides a unique opportunity to assess vegetation response to increasing CO2 by providing data atambient and elevated CO2 conditions. Therefore, to better capture the ecosystem response to increased CO2, we add the data from two FACE sites to our optimisations, in addition to the Fluxnet data. We use data from both CO2 conditions of the Free Air CO2 Enrichment experiment, which allows us to gain extra confidence in the model simulations using this set of parameters. We find that we are able to improve the magnitude of modelled productivity, although we are unable to correct the interannual variability. Using an idealised simulation experiment based on increasing atmospheric CO2 by 1% per year over 100 years, we find that the predicted production is higher for the optimised model than the prior model and that the model has different rates of change of the fertilisation effect of CO2 for the different forest types considered. 
    1110 
    1211 
     
    1413== Code access == 
    1514 
    16 * See the version on the webinterface here : https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/browser/branches/publications/ORCHIDEE_CN_CAN_r5698 
     15* See the version on the webinterface here : https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/browser/branches/publications/ORCHIDEE_3_r6863 
    1716* Extract it on a terminal as follow, type anonymous as password:  
    1817{{{ 
    19 svn co --username anonymous svn://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/branches/publications/ORCHIDEE_CN_CAN_r5698 ORCHIDEE 
     18svn co --username anonymous svn://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/branches/publications/ORCHIDEE_3_r6863 ORCHIDEE 
    2019}}} 
    2120 
    2221== Metadata == 
    2322 
    24 || DOI || [https://doi.org/10.14768/20200228001.1 10.14768/20200228001.1] || 
    25 || Creator || Sebastiaan Luyssaert || 
    26 || Affiliation || VU Amsterdam || 
    27 || Title || ORCHIDEE_CN_CAN revision 5698 || 
     23|| DOI || [https:TO BE SET] || 
     24|| Creator || Nicolas Vuichard || 
     25|| Affiliation || Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement || 
     26|| Title || ORCHIDEE_3 revision 6863 || 
    2827|| Publisher || Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL) || 
    29 || //PublicationYear// || 2019 || 
     28|| //PublicationYear// || 2023 || 
    3029|| //ResourceType//  || Software || 
    3130|| //Rights// || This software is distributed under the CeCILL license || 
    3231|| //rightsURI // || http://www.cecill.info/ || 
    33 || Subject || Land surface model, International Tree Ring Data Bank (ITRDB), long-term benchmark for tree growth || 
     32|| Subject || Land surface model || 
    3433|| //DataManager// || Karim Ramage (IPSL) || 
    3534|| //DataCurator// || Josefine Ghattas (IPSL) || 
    36 || //ContactPerson// || Sebastiaan Luyssaert (VU Amsterdam) || 
    37 || //FundingReference// || VERIFY project under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 776810; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) through the program "Make Our Planet Great Again”; Earth Systems and Climate Change Hub by the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program || 
     35|| //ContactPerson// || Nicolas Vuichard (LSCE) || 
     36|| //FundingReference// || ||