Changeset 11692 for NEMO/branches/2019/dev_r11514_HPC-02_single-core-extrahalo/doc/latex/NEMO/subfiles/chap_DOM.tex
- Timestamp:
- 2019-10-12T16:08:18+02:00 (5 years ago)
- Location:
- NEMO/branches/2019/dev_r11514_HPC-02_single-core-extrahalo/doc
- Files:
-
- 5 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
NEMO/branches/2019/dev_r11514_HPC-02_single-core-extrahalo/doc
-
Property
svn:externals
set to
^/utils/badges badges
^/utils/logos logos
-
Property
svn:externals
set to
-
NEMO/branches/2019/dev_r11514_HPC-02_single-core-extrahalo/doc/latex
- Property svn:ignore deleted
-
NEMO/branches/2019/dev_r11514_HPC-02_single-core-extrahalo/doc/latex/NEMO
-
Property
svn:externals
set to
^/utils/figures/NEMO figures
-
Property
svn:externals
set to
-
NEMO/branches/2019/dev_r11514_HPC-02_single-core-extrahalo/doc/latex/NEMO/subfiles
- Property svn:ignore
-
old new 1 *.aux 2 *.bbl 3 *.blg 4 *.dvi 5 *.fdb* 6 *.fls 7 *.idx 1 *.ind 8 2 *.ilg 9 *.ind10 *.log11 *.maf12 *.mtc*13 *.out14 *.pdf15 *.toc16 _minted-*
-
- Property svn:ignore
-
NEMO/branches/2019/dev_r11514_HPC-02_single-core-extrahalo/doc/latex/NEMO/subfiles/chap_DOM.tex
r11435 r11692 2 2 3 3 \begin{document} 4 % ================================================================ 5 % Chapter 2 ——— Space and Time Domain (DOM) 6 % ================================================================ 4 7 5 \chapter{Space Domain (DOM)} 8 6 \label{chap:DOM} 9 7 10 %\chaptertoc 11 12 % Missing things: 13 % - istate: description of the initial state ==> this has to be put elsewhere.. 14 % perhaps in MISC ? By the way the initialisation of T S and dynamics 15 % should be put outside of DOM routine (better with TRC staff and off-line 16 % tracers) 17 % -geo2ocean: how to switch from geographic to mesh coordinate 18 % - domclo: closed sea and lakes.... management of closea sea area : specific to global configuration, both forced and coupled 19 20 \vfill 21 22 \begin{table}[b] 23 \footnotesize 24 \caption*{Changes record} 25 \begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{l||X|X} 26 Release & Author(s) & Modifications \\ 27 \hline 28 {\em 4.0} & {\em Simon M\"{u}ller \& Andrew Coward} & 29 {\em 30 Compatibility changes Major simplification has moved many of the options to external domain configuration tools. 31 (see \autoref{apdx:DOMAINcfg}) 32 } \\ 33 {\em 3.x} & {\em Rachid Benshila, Gurvan Madec \& S\'{e}bastien Masson} & 34 {\em First version} \\ 8 % Missing things 9 % - istate: description of the initial state ==> this has to be put elsewhere.. 10 % perhaps in MISC ? By the way the initialisation of T S and dynamics 11 % should be put outside of DOM routine (better with TRC staff and off-line 12 % tracers) 13 % - geo2ocean: how to switch from geographic to mesh coordinate 14 % - domclo: closed sea and lakes.... 15 % management of closea sea area: specific to global cfg, both forced and coupled 16 17 \thispagestyle{plain} 18 19 \chaptertoc 20 21 \paragraph{Changes record} ~\\ 22 23 {\footnotesize 24 \begin{tabularx}{0.8\textwidth}{l||X|X} 25 Release & 26 Author(s) & 27 Modifications \\ 28 \hline 29 {\em 4.0 } & 30 {\em Simon M\"{u}ller \& Andrew Coward \newline \newline 31 Simona Flavoni and Tim Graham } & 32 {\em Compatibility changes: many options moved to external domain configuration tools 33 (see \autoref{apdx:DOMCFG}). \newline 34 Updates } \\ 35 {\em 3.6 } & 36 {\em Rachid Benshila, Christian \'{E}th\'{e}, Pierre Mathiot and Gurvan Madec } & 37 {\em Updates } \\ 38 {\em $\leq$ 3.4 } & 39 {\em Gurvan Madec and S\'{e}bastien Masson } & 40 {\em First version } 35 41 \end{tabularx} 36 \end{table} 37 38 \newpage 39 40 Having defined the continuous equations in \autoref{chap:PE} and chosen a time discretisation \autoref{chap:STP}, 42 } 43 44 \clearpage 45 46 Having defined the continuous equations in \autoref{chap:MB} and 47 chosen a time discretisation \autoref{chap:TD}, 41 48 we need to choose a grid for spatial discretisation and related numerical algorithms. 42 49 In the present chapter, we provide a general description of the staggered grid used in \NEMO, 43 50 and other relevant information about the DOM (DOMain) source code modules. 44 51 45 % ================================================================ 46 % Fundamentals of the Discretisation 47 % ================================================================ 52 %% ================================================================================================= 48 53 \section{Fundamentals of the discretisation} 49 54 \label{sec:DOM_basics} 50 55 51 % ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 52 % Arrangement of Variables 53 % ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 56 %% ================================================================================================= 54 57 \subsection{Arrangement of variables} 55 58 \label{subsec:DOM_cell} 56 59 57 %>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 58 \begin{figure}[!tb] 59 \begin{center} 60 \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{Fig_cell} 61 \caption{ 62 \protect\label{fig:cell} 63 Arrangement of variables. 64 $t$ indicates scalar points where temperature, salinity, density, pressure and 65 horizontal divergence are defined. 66 $(u,v,w)$ indicates vector points, and $f$ indicates vorticity points where both relative and 67 planetary vorticities are defined. 68 } 69 \end{center} 60 \begin{figure} 61 \centering 62 \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth]{DOM_cell} 63 \caption[Arrangement of variables in the unit cell of space domain]{ 64 Arrangement of variables in the unit cell of space domain. 65 $t$ indicates scalar points where 66 temperature, salinity, density, pressure and horizontal divergence are defined. 67 $(u,v,w)$ indicates vector points, and $f$ indicates vorticity points where 68 both relative and planetary vorticities are defined.} 69 \label{fig:DOM_cell} 70 70 \end{figure} 71 %>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 72 73 The numerical techniques used to solve the Primitive Equations in this model are based on the traditional, 74 centred second-order finite difference approximation. 71 72 The numerical techniques used to solve the Primitive Equations in this model are based on 73 the traditional, centred second-order finite difference approximation. 75 74 Special attention has been given to the homogeneity of the solution in the three spatial directions. 76 75 The arrangement of variables is the same in all directions. 77 It consists of cells centred on scalar points ($t$, $S$, $p$, $\rho$) with vector points $(u, v, w)$ defined in 78 the centre of each face of the cells (\autoref{fig:cell}). 79 This is the generalisation to three dimensions of the well-known ``C'' grid in Arakawa's classification 80 \citep{mesinger.arakawa_bk76}. 81 The relative and planetary vorticity, $\zeta$ and $f$, are defined in the centre of each vertical edge and 82 the barotropic stream function $\psi$ is defined at horizontal points overlying the $\zeta$ and $f$-points. 83 84 The ocean mesh (\ie\ the position of all the scalar and vector points) is defined by the transformation that 85 gives $(\lambda,\varphi,z)$ as a function of $(i,j,k)$. 86 The grid-points are located at integer or integer and a half value of $(i,j,k)$ as indicated on \autoref{tab:cell}. 87 In all the following, subscripts $u$, $v$, $w$, $f$, $uw$, $vw$ or $fw$ indicate the position of 88 the grid-point where the scale factors are defined. 89 Each scale factor is defined as the local analytical value provided by \autoref{eq:scale_factors}. 76 It consists of cells centred on scalar points ($t$, $S$, $p$, $\rho$) with 77 vector points $(u, v, w)$ defined in the centre of each face of the cells (\autoref{fig:DOM_cell}). 78 This is the generalisation to three dimensions of the well-known ``C'' grid in 79 Arakawa's classification \citep{mesinger.arakawa_bk76}. 80 The relative and planetary vorticity, $\zeta$ and $f$, are defined in the centre of each 81 vertical edge and the barotropic stream function $\psi$ is defined at horizontal points overlying 82 the $\zeta$ and $f$-points. 83 84 The ocean mesh (\ie\ the position of all the scalar and vector points) is defined by 85 the transformation that gives $(\lambda,\varphi,z)$ as a function of $(i,j,k)$. 86 The grid-points are located at integer or integer and a half value of $(i,j,k)$ as indicated on 87 \autoref{tab:DOM_cell}. 88 In all the following, 89 subscripts $u$, $v$, $w$, $f$, $uw$, $vw$ or $fw$ indicate the position of the grid-point where 90 the scale factors are defined. 91 Each scale factor is defined as the local analytical value provided by \autoref{eq:MB_scale_factors}. 90 92 As a result, the mesh on which partial derivatives $\pd[]{\lambda}$, $\pd[]{\varphi}$ and 91 93 $\pd[]{z}$ are evaluated is a uniform mesh with a grid size of unity. 92 Discrete partial derivatives are formulated by the traditional, centred second order finite difference approximation 93 while the scale factors are chosen equal to their local analytical value. 94 Discrete partial derivatives are formulated by 95 the traditional, centred second order finite difference approximation while 96 the scale factors are chosen equal to their local analytical value. 94 97 An important point here is that the partial derivative of the scale factors must be evaluated by 95 98 centred finite difference approximation, not from their analytical expression. 96 This preserves the symmetry of the discrete set of equations and therefore satisfies many of97 the continuous properties (see \autoref{apdx:C}).99 This preserves the symmetry of the discrete set of equations and 100 therefore satisfies many of the continuous properties (see \autoref{apdx:INVARIANTS}). 98 101 A similar, related remark can be made about the domain size: 99 when needed, an area, volume, or the total ocean depth must be evaluated as the product or sum of the relevant scale factors 100 (see \autoref{eq:DOM_bar} in the next section). 101 102 %>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 103 \begin{table}[!tb] 104 \begin{center} 105 \begin{tabular}{|p{46pt}|p{56pt}|p{56pt}|p{56pt}|} 106 \hline 107 t & $i $ & $j $ & $k $ \\ 108 \hline 109 u & $i + 1/2$ & $j $ & $k $ \\ 110 \hline 111 v & $i $ & $j + 1/2$ & $k $ \\ 112 \hline 113 w & $i $ & $j $ & $k + 1/2$ \\ 114 \hline 115 f & $i + 1/2$ & $j + 1/2$ & $k $ \\ 116 \hline 117 uw & $i + 1/2$ & $j $ & $k + 1/2$ \\ 118 \hline 119 vw & $i $ & $j + 1/2$ & $k + 1/2$ \\ 120 \hline 121 fw & $i + 1/2$ & $j + 1/2$ & $k + 1/2$ \\ 122 \hline 123 \end{tabular} 124 \caption{ 125 \protect\label{tab:cell} 126 Location of grid-points as a function of integer or integer and a half value of the column, line or level. 127 This indexing is only used for the writing of the semi -discrete equations. 128 In the code, the indexing uses integer values only and is positive downwards in the vertical with $k=1$ at the surface. 129 (see \autoref{subsec:DOM_Num_Index}) 130 } 131 \end{center} 102 when needed, an area, volume, or the total ocean depth must be evaluated as 103 the product or sum of the relevant scale factors (see \autoref{eq:DOM_bar} in the next section). 104 105 \begin{table} 106 \centering 107 \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} 108 \hline 109 t & $i $ & $j $ & $k $ \\ 110 \hline 111 u & $i + 1/2$ & $j $ & $k $ \\ 112 \hline 113 v & $i $ & $j + 1/2$ & $k $ \\ 114 \hline 115 w & $i $ & $j $ & $k + 1/2$ \\ 116 \hline 117 f & $i + 1/2$ & $j + 1/2$ & $k $ \\ 118 \hline 119 uw & $i + 1/2$ & $j $ & $k + 1/2$ \\ 120 \hline 121 vw & $i $ & $j + 1/2$ & $k + 1/2$ \\ 122 \hline 123 fw & $i + 1/2$ & $j + 1/2$ & $k + 1/2$ \\ 124 \hline 125 \end{tabular} 126 \caption[Location of grid-points]{ 127 Location of grid-points as a function of integer or 128 integer and a half value of the column, line or level. 129 This indexing is only used for the writing of the semi-discrete equations. 130 In the code, the indexing uses integer values only and 131 is positive downwards in the vertical with $k=1$ at the surface. 132 (see \autoref{subsec:DOM_Num_Index})} 133 \label{tab:DOM_cell} 132 134 \end{table} 133 %>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>134 135 135 136 Note that the definition of the scale factors … … 143 144 firstly, there is no ambiguity in the scale factors appearing in the discrete equations, 144 145 since they are first introduced in the continuous equations; 145 secondly, analytical transformations encourage good practice by the definition of smoothly varying grids 146 (rather than allowing the user to set arbitrary jumps in thickness between adjacent layers) \citep{treguier.dukowicz.ea_JGR96}. 147 An example of the effect of such a choice is shown in \autoref{fig:zgr_e3}. 148 %>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 149 \begin{figure}[!t] 150 \begin{center} 151 \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{Fig_zgr_e3} 152 \caption{ 153 \protect\label{fig:zgr_e3} 154 Comparison of (a) traditional definitions of grid-point position and grid-size in the vertical, 155 and (b) analytically derived grid-point position and scale factors. 156 For both grids here, the same $w$-point depth has been chosen but 157 in (a) the $t$-points are set half way between $w$-points while 158 in (b) they are defined from an analytical function: 159 $z(k) = 5 \, (k - 1/2)^3 - 45 \, (k - 1/2)^2 + 140 \, (k - 1/2) - 150$. 160 Note the resulting difference between the value of the grid-size $\Delta_k$ and 161 those of the scale factor $e_k$. 162 } 163 \end{center} 146 secondly, analytical transformations encourage good practice by 147 the definition of smoothly varying grids 148 (rather than allowing the user to set arbitrary jumps in thickness between adjacent layers) 149 \citep{treguier.dukowicz.ea_JGR96}. 150 An example of the effect of such a choice is shown in \autoref{fig:DOM_zgr_e3}. 151 \begin{figure} 152 \centering 153 \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{DOM_zgr_e3} 154 \caption[Comparison of grid-point position, vertical grid-size and scale factors]{ 155 Comparison of (a) traditional definitions of grid-point position and grid-size in the vertical, 156 and (b) analytically derived grid-point position and scale factors. 157 For both grids here, the same $w$-point depth has been chosen but 158 in (a) the $t$-points are set half way between $w$-points while 159 in (b) they are defined from an analytical function: 160 $z(k) = 5 \, (k - 1/2)^3 - 45 \, (k - 1/2)^2 + 140 \, (k - 1/2) - 150$. 161 Note the resulting difference between the value of the grid-size $\Delta_k$ and 162 those of the scale factor $e_k$.} 163 \label{fig:DOM_zgr_e3} 164 164 \end{figure} 165 %>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 166 167 % ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 168 % Vector Invariant Formulation 169 % ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 165 166 %% ================================================================================================= 170 167 \subsection{Discrete operators} 171 168 \label{subsec:DOM_operators} 172 169 173 Given the values of a variable $q$ at adjacent points, the differencing and averaging operators at174 the midpoint between them are:170 Given the values of a variable $q$ at adjacent points, 171 the differencing and averaging operators at the midpoint between them are: 175 172 \begin{alignat*}{2} 176 % \label{eq: di_mi}173 % \label{eq:DOM_di_mi} 177 174 \delta_i [q] &= & &q (i + 1/2) - q (i - 1/2) \\ 178 175 \overline q^{\, i} &= &\big\{ &q (i + 1/2) + q (i - 1/2) \big\} / 2 … … 180 177 181 178 Similar operators are defined with respect to $i + 1/2$, $j$, $j + 1/2$, $k$, and $k + 1/2$. 182 Following \autoref{eq:PE_grad} and \autoref{eq:PE_lap}, the gradient of a variable $q$ defined at a $t$-point has 183 its three components defined at $u$-, $v$- and $w$-points while its Laplacian is defined at the $t$-point. 179 Following \autoref{eq:MB_grad} and \autoref{eq:MB_lap}, 180 the gradient of a variable $q$ defined at a $t$-point has 181 its three components defined at $u$-, $v$- and $w$-points while 182 its Laplacian is defined at the $t$-point. 184 183 These operators have the following discrete forms in the curvilinear $s$-coordinates system: 185 \ [184 \begin{gather*} 186 185 % \label{eq:DOM_grad} 187 186 \nabla q \equiv \frac{1}{e_{1u}} \delta_{i + 1/2} [q] \; \, \vect i 188 187 + \frac{1}{e_{2v}} \delta_{j + 1/2} [q] \; \, \vect j 189 + \frac{1}{e_{3w}} \delta_{k + 1/2} [q] \; \, \vect k 190 \] 191 \begin{multline*} 188 + \frac{1}{e_{3w}} \delta_{k + 1/2} [q] \; \, \vect k \\ 192 189 % \label{eq:DOM_lap} 193 190 \Delta q \equiv \frac{1}{e_{1t} \, e_{2t} \, e_{3t}} 194 191 \; \lt[ \delta_i \lt( \frac{e_{2u} \, e_{3u}}{e_{1u}} \; \delta_{i + 1/2} [q] \rt) 195 + \delta_j \lt( \frac{e_{1v} \, e_{3v}}{e_{2v}} \; \delta_{j + 1/2} [q] \rt) \; \rt] \\192 + \delta_j \lt( \frac{e_{1v} \, e_{3v}}{e_{2v}} \; \delta_{j + 1/2} [q] \rt) \; \rt] 196 193 + \frac{1}{e_{3t}} 197 194 \delta_k \lt[ \frac{1 }{e_{3w}} \; \delta_{k + 1/2} [q] \rt] 198 \end{multline*} 199 200 Following \autoref{eq:PE_curl} and \autoref{eq:PE_div}, a vector $\vect A = (a_1,a_2,a_3)$ defined at 201 vector points $(u,v,w)$ has its three curl components defined at $vw$-, $uw$, and $f$-points, and 195 \end{gather*} 196 197 Following \autoref{eq:MB_curl} and \autoref{eq:MB_div}, 198 a vector $\vect A = (a_1,a_2,a_3)$ defined at vector points $(u,v,w)$ has 199 its three curl components defined at $vw$-, $uw$, and $f$-points, and 202 200 its divergence defined at $t$-points: 203 \begin{multline }201 \begin{multline*} 204 202 % \label{eq:DOM_curl} 205 203 \nabla \times \vect A \equiv \frac{1}{e_{2v} \, e_{3vw}} … … 212 210 \Big[ \delta_{i + 1/2} (e_{2v} \, a_2) 213 211 - \delta_{j + 1/2} (e_{1u} \, a_1) \Big] \vect k 214 \end{multline }215 \ begin{equation}212 \end{multline*} 213 \[ 216 214 % \label{eq:DOM_div} 217 215 \nabla \cdot \vect A \equiv \frac{1}{e_{1t} \, e_{2t} \, e_{3t}} 218 216 \Big[ \delta_i (e_{2u} \, e_{3u} \, a_1) + \delta_j (e_{1v} \, e_{3v} \, a_2) \Big] 219 217 + \frac{1}{e_{3t}} \delta_k (a_3) 220 \ end{equation}221 222 The vertical average over the whole water column is denoted by an overbar and is for223 a masked field $q$ (\ie\ a quantity that is equal to zero inside solid areas):218 \] 219 220 The vertical average over the whole water column is denoted by an overbar and 221 is for a masked field $q$ (\ie\ a quantity that is equal to zero inside solid areas): 224 222 \begin{equation} 225 223 \label{eq:DOM_bar} … … 227 225 \end{equation} 228 226 where $H_q$ is the ocean depth, which is the masked sum of the vertical scale factors at $q$ points, 229 $k^b$ and $k^o$ are the bottom and surface $k$-indices, and the symbol $\sum \limits_k$ refers to a summation over 230 all grid points of the same type in the direction indicated by the subscript (here $k$). 227 $k^b$ and $k^o$ are the bottom and surface $k$-indices, 228 and the symbol $\sum \limits_k$ refers to a summation over all grid points of the same type in 229 the direction indicated by the subscript (here $k$). 231 230 232 231 In continuous form, the following properties are satisfied: … … 238 237 \end{gather} 239 238 240 It is straightforward to demonstrate that these properties are verified locally in discrete form as soon as241 the scalar $q$ is taken at $t$-points and the vector $\vect A$ has its components defined at239 It is straightforward to demonstrate that these properties are verified locally in discrete form as 240 soon as the scalar $q$ is taken at $t$-points and the vector $\vect A$ has its components defined at 242 241 vector points $(u,v,w)$. 243 242 244 243 Let $a$ and $b$ be two fields defined on the mesh, with a value of zero inside continental areas. 245 It can be shown that the differencing operators ($\delta_i$, $\delta_j$ and $\delta_k$) 246 are skew-symmetric linear operators, and further that the averaging operators $\overline{\cdots}^{\, i}$, 247 $\overline{\cdots}^{\, j}$ and $\overline{\cdots}^{\, k}$) are symmetric linear operators, \ie 248 \begin{alignat}{4} 244 It can be shown that the differencing operators ($\delta_i$, $\delta_j$ and 245 $\delta_k$) are skew-symmetric linear operators, 246 and further that the averaging operators ($\overline{\cdots}^{\, i}$, $\overline{\cdots}^{\, j}$ and 247 $\overline{\cdots}^{\, k}$) are symmetric linear operators, \ie 248 \begin{alignat}{5} 249 249 \label{eq:DOM_di_adj} 250 250 &\sum \limits_i a_i \; \delta_i [b] &\equiv &- &&\sum \limits_i \delta _{ i + 1/2} [a] &b_{i + 1/2} \\ … … 253 253 \end{alignat} 254 254 255 In other words, the adjoint of the differencing and averaging operators are $\delta_i^* = \delta_{i + 1/2}$ and 255 In other words, 256 the adjoint of the differencing and averaging operators are $\delta_i^* = \delta_{i + 1/2}$ and 256 257 $(\overline{\cdots}^{\, i})^* = \overline{\cdots}^{\, i + 1/2}$, respectively. 257 These two properties will be used extensively in the \autoref{apdx: C} to258 These two properties will be used extensively in the \autoref{apdx:INVARIANTS} to 258 259 demonstrate integral conservative properties of the discrete formulation chosen. 259 260 260 % ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 261 % Numerical Indexing 262 % ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 261 %% ================================================================================================= 263 262 \subsection{Numerical indexing} 264 263 \label{subsec:DOM_Num_Index} 265 264 266 %>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 267 \begin{figure}[!tb] 268 \begin{center} 269 \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{Fig_index_hor} 270 \caption{ 271 \protect\label{fig:index_hor} 272 Horizontal integer indexing used in the \fortran code. 273 The dashed area indicates the cell in which variables contained in arrays have the same $i$- and $j$-indices 274 } 275 \end{center} 265 \begin{figure} 266 \centering 267 \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth]{DOM_index_hor} 268 \caption[Horizontal integer indexing]{ 269 Horizontal integer indexing used in the \fortran\ code. 270 The dashed area indicates the cell in which 271 variables contained in arrays have the same $i$- and $j$-indices} 272 \label{fig:DOM_index_hor} 276 273 \end{figure} 277 %>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 278 279 The array representation used in the \fortran code requires an integer indexing. 280 However, the analytical definition of the mesh (see \autoref{subsec:DOM_cell}) is associated with the use of 281 integer values for $t$-points only whileall the other points involve integer and a half values.274 275 The array representation used in the \fortran\ code requires an integer indexing. 276 However, the analytical definition of the mesh (see \autoref{subsec:DOM_cell}) is associated with 277 the use of integer values for $t$-points only while 278 all the other points involve integer and a half values. 282 279 Therefore, a specific integer indexing has been defined for points other than $t$-points 283 280 (\ie\ velocity and vorticity grid-points). 284 Furthermore, the direction of the vertical indexing has been reversed and the surface level set at $k = 1$. 285 286 % ----------------------------------- 287 % Horizontal Indexing 288 % ----------------------------------- 281 Furthermore, the direction of the vertical indexing has been reversed and 282 the surface level set at $k = 1$. 283 284 %% ================================================================================================= 289 285 \subsubsection{Horizontal indexing} 290 286 \label{subsec:DOM_Num_Index_hor} 291 287 292 The indexing in the horizontal plane has been chosen as shown in \autoref{fig: index_hor}.288 The indexing in the horizontal plane has been chosen as shown in \autoref{fig:DOM_index_hor}. 293 289 For an increasing $i$ index ($j$ index), 294 290 the $t$-point and the eastward $u$-point (northward $v$-point) have the same index 295 (see the dashed area in \autoref{fig: index_hor}).291 (see the dashed area in \autoref{fig:DOM_index_hor}). 296 292 A $t$-point and its nearest north-east $f$-point have the same $i$-and $j$-indices. 297 293 298 % ----------------------------------- 299 % Vertical indexing 300 % ----------------------------------- 294 %% ================================================================================================= 301 295 \subsubsection{Vertical indexing} 302 296 \label{subsec:DOM_Num_Index_vertical} 303 297 304 In the vertical, the chosen indexing requires special attention since the direction of the $k$-axis in305 the \fortran code is the reverse of that used in the semi -discrete equations and306 given in \autoref{subsec:DOM_cell}.307 The sea surface corresponds to the $w$-level $k = 1$, which is the same index as the $t$-level just below308 (\autoref{fig:index_vert}).298 In the vertical, the chosen indexing requires special attention since 299 the direction of the $k$-axis in the \fortran\ code is the reverse of 300 that used in the semi-discrete equations and given in \autoref{subsec:DOM_cell}. 301 The sea surface corresponds to the $w$-level $k = 1$, 302 which is the same index as the $t$-level just below (\autoref{fig:DOM_index_vert}). 309 303 The last $w$-level ($k = jpk$) either corresponds to or is below the ocean floor while 310 the last $t$-level is always outside the ocean domain (\autoref{fig: index_vert}).304 the last $t$-level is always outside the ocean domain (\autoref{fig:DOM_index_vert}). 311 305 Note that a $w$-point and the directly underlaying $t$-point have a common $k$ index 312 306 (\ie\ $t$-points and their nearest $w$-point neighbour in negative index direction), 313 in contrast to the indexing on the horizontal plane where the $t$-point has the same index as 314 the nearest velocity points in the positive direction of the respective horizontal axis index 315 (compare the dashed area in \autoref{fig:index_hor} and \autoref{fig:index_vert}). 307 in contrast to the indexing on the horizontal plane where 308 the $t$-point has the same index as the nearest velocity points in 309 the positive direction of the respective horizontal axis index 310 (compare the dashed area in \autoref{fig:DOM_index_hor} and \autoref{fig:DOM_index_vert}). 316 311 Since the scale factors are chosen to be strictly positive, 317 a \textit{minus sign} is included in the \fortran implementations of312 a \textit{minus sign} is included in the \fortran\ implementations of 318 313 \textit{all the vertical derivatives} of the discrete equations given in this manual in order to 319 314 accommodate the opposing vertical index directions in implementation and documentation. 320 315 321 %>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 322 \begin{figure}[!pt] 323 \begin{center} 324 \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{Fig_index_vert} 325 \caption{ 326 \protect\label{fig:index_vert} 327 Vertical integer indexing used in the \fortran code. 328 Note that the $k$-axis is oriented downward. 329 The dashed area indicates the cell in which variables contained in arrays have a common $k$-index. 330 } 331 \end{center} 316 \begin{figure} 317 \centering 318 \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth]{DOM_index_vert} 319 \caption[Vertical integer indexing]{ 320 Vertical integer indexing used in the \fortran\ code. 321 Note that the $k$-axis is oriented downward. 322 The dashed area indicates the cell in which 323 variables contained in arrays have a common $k$-index.} 324 \label{fig:DOM_index_vert} 332 325 \end{figure} 333 %>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 334 335 % ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 336 % Domain configuration 337 % ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 326 327 %% ================================================================================================= 338 328 \section{Spatial domain configuration} 339 329 \label{subsec:DOM_config} 340 330 341 \nlst{namcfg}342 343 331 Two typical methods are available to specify the spatial domain configuration; 344 they can be selected using parameter \np{ln\_read\_cfg} parameter in namelist \nam{cfg}. 345 346 If \np{ln\_read\_cfg} is set to \forcode{.true.}, 347 the domain-specific parameters and fields are read from a netCDF input file, 348 whose name (without its .nc suffix) can be specified as the value of the \np{cn\_domcfg} parameter in namelist \nam{cfg}. 349 350 If \np{ln\_read\_cfg} is set to \forcode{.false.}, 332 they can be selected using parameter \np{ln_read_cfg}{ln\_read\_cfg} parameter in 333 namelist \nam{cfg}{cfg}. 334 335 If \np{ln_read_cfg}{ln\_read\_cfg} is set to \forcode{.true.}, 336 the domain-specific parameters and fields are read from a NetCDF input file, 337 whose name (without its .nc suffix) can be specified as 338 the value of the \np{cn_domcfg}{cn\_domcfg} parameter in namelist \nam{cfg}{cfg}. 339 340 If \np{ln_read_cfg}{ln\_read\_cfg} is set to \forcode{.false.}, 351 341 the domain-specific parameters and fields can be provided (\eg\ analytically computed) by 352 342 subroutines \mdl{usrdef\_hgr} and \mdl{usrdef\_zgr}. 353 343 These subroutines can be supplied in the \path{MY_SRC} directory of the configuration, 354 and default versions that configure the spatial domain for the GYRE reference configuration are present in355 the \path{./src/OCE/USR} directory.344 and default versions that configure the spatial domain for the GYRE reference configuration are 345 present in the \path{./src/OCE/USR} directory. 356 346 357 347 In version 4.0 there are no longer any options for reading complex bathymetries and … … 360 350 to run similar models with and without partial bottom boxes and/or sigma-coordinates, 361 351 supporting such choices leads to overly complex code. 362 Worse still is the difficulty of ensuring the model configurations intended to be identical are indeed so when 363 the model domain itself can be altered by runtime selections. 364 The code previously used to perform vertical discretisation has been incorporated into an external tool 365 (\path{./tools/DOMAINcfg}) which is briefly described in \autoref{apdx:DOMAINcfg}. 366 367 The next subsections summarise the parameter and fields related to the configuration of the whole model domain. 368 These represent the minimum information that must be provided either via the \np{cn\_domcfg} file or set by code 369 inserted into user-supplied versions of the \texttt{usrdef\_*} subroutines. 352 Worse still is the difficulty of ensuring the model configurations intended to be identical are 353 indeed so when the model domain itself can be altered by runtime selections. 354 The code previously used to perform vertical discretisation has been incorporated into 355 an external tool (\path{./tools/DOMAINcfg}) which is briefly described in \autoref{apdx:DOMCFG}. 356 357 The next subsections summarise the parameter and fields related to 358 the configuration of the whole model domain. 359 These represent the minimum information that must be provided either via 360 the \np{cn_domcfg}{cn\_domcfg} file or 361 set by code inserted into user-supplied versions of the \texttt{usrdef\_*} subroutines. 370 362 The requirements are presented in three sections: 371 363 the domain size (\autoref{subsec:DOM_size}), the horizontal mesh (\autoref{subsec:DOM_hgr}), 372 364 and the vertical grid (\autoref{subsec:DOM_zgr}). 373 365 374 % ----------------------------------- 375 % Domain Size 376 % ----------------------------------- 366 %% ================================================================================================= 377 367 \subsection{Domain size} 378 368 \label{subsec:DOM_size} 379 369 380 The total size of the computational domain is set by the parameters \jp{jpiglo}, \jp{jpjglo} and \jp{jpkglo} for381 the $i$, $j$ and $k$ directions, respectively.382 Note, that the variables \texttt{jpi} and \texttt{jpj} refer to the size of each processor subdomain when383 the code is run in parallel using domain decomposition (\key{mpp\_mpi} defined,384 see \autoref{sec:LBC_mpp}).385 386 The name of the configuration is set through parameter \np{cn \_cfg},387 and the nominal resolution through parameter \np{nn \_cfg}370 The total size of the computational domain is set by the parameters \jp{jpiglo}, \jp{jpjglo} and 371 \jp{jpkglo} for the $i$, $j$ and $k$ directions, respectively. 372 Note, that the variables \texttt{jpi} and \texttt{jpj} refer to 373 the size of each processor subdomain when the code is run in parallel using domain decomposition 374 (\key{mpp\_mpi} defined, see \autoref{sec:LBC_mpp}). 375 376 The name of the configuration is set through parameter \np{cn_cfg}{cn\_cfg}, 377 and the nominal resolution through parameter \np{nn_cfg}{nn\_cfg} 388 378 (unless in the input file both of variables \texttt{ORCA} and \texttt{ORCA\_index} are present, 389 in which case \np{cn \_cfg} and \np{nn\_cfg} are set from these values accordingly).379 in which case \np{cn_cfg}{cn\_cfg} and \np{nn_cfg}{nn\_cfg} are set from these values accordingly). 390 380 391 381 The global lateral boundary condition type is selected from 8 options using parameter \jp{jperio}. 392 See \autoref{sec:LBC_jperio} for details on the available options and the corresponding values for \jp{jperio}. 393 394 % ================================================================ 395 % Domain: Horizontal Grid (mesh) 396 % ================================================================ 397 \subsection{Horizontal grid mesh (\protect\mdl{domhgr})} 382 See \autoref{sec:LBC_jperio} for details on the available options and 383 the corresponding values for \jp{jperio}. 384 385 %% ================================================================================================= 386 \subsection[Horizontal grid mesh (\textit{domhgr.F90}]{Horizontal grid mesh (\protect\mdl{domhgr})} 398 387 \label{subsec:DOM_hgr} 399 388 400 % ================================================================ 401 % Domain: List of hgr-related fields needed 402 % ================================================================ 389 %% ================================================================================================= 403 390 \subsubsection{Required fields} 404 391 \label{sec:DOM_hgr_fields} 405 392 406 The explicit specification of a range of mesh-related fields are required for the definition of a configuration. 393 The explicit specification of a range of mesh-related fields are required for 394 the definition of a configuration. 407 395 These include: 408 396 409 397 \begin{clines} 410 int jpiglo, jpjglo, jpkglo /* global domain sizes*/411 int jperio /* lateral global domain b.c.*/412 double glamt, glamu, glamv, glamf /* geographic longitude (t,u,v and f points respectively)*/413 double gphit, gphiu, gphiv, gphif /* geographic latitude*/414 double e1t, e1u, e1v, e1f /* horizontal scale factors*/415 double e2t, e2u, e2v, e2f /* horizontal scale factors*/398 int jpiglo, jpjglo, jpkglo /* global domain sizes */ 399 int jperio /* lateral global domain b.c. */ 400 double glamt, glamu, glamv, glamf /* geographic longitude (t,u,v and f points respectively) */ 401 double gphit, gphiu, gphiv, gphif /* geographic latitude */ 402 double e1t, e1u, e1v, e1f /* horizontal scale factors */ 403 double e2t, e2u, e2v, e2f /* horizontal scale factors */ 416 404 \end{clines} 417 405 418 406 The values of the geographic longitude and latitude arrays at indices $i,j$ correspond to 419 407 the analytical expressions of the longitude $\lambda$ and latitude $\varphi$ as a function of $(i,j)$, 420 evaluated at the values as specified in \autoref{tab: cell} for the respective grid-point position.408 evaluated at the values as specified in \autoref{tab:DOM_cell} for the respective grid-point position. 421 409 The calculation of the values of the horizontal scale factor arrays in general additionally involves 422 410 partial derivatives of $\lambda$ and $\varphi$ with respect to $i$ and $j$, 423 411 evaluated for the same arguments as $\lambda$ and $\varphi$. 424 412 413 %% ================================================================================================= 425 414 \subsubsection{Optional fields} 426 415 427 416 \begin{clines} 428 /* Optional:*/429 int ORCA, ORCA_index /* configuration name, configuration resolution*/430 double e1e2u, e1e2v /* U and V surfaces (if grid size reduction in some straits)*/431 double ff_f, ff_t /* Coriolis parameter (if not on the sphere)*/417 /* Optional: */ 418 int ORCA, ORCA_index /* configuration name, configuration resolution */ 419 double e1e2u, e1e2v /* U and V surfaces (if grid size reduction in some straits) */ 420 double ff_f, ff_t /* Coriolis parameter (if not on the sphere) */ 432 421 \end{clines} 433 422 … … 436 425 This is particularly useful for locations such as Gibraltar or Indonesian Throughflow pinch-points 437 426 (see \autoref{sec:MISC_strait} for illustrated examples). 438 The key is to reduce the faces of $T$-cell (\ie\ change the value of the horizontal scale factors at $u$- or $v$-point) but 427 The key is to reduce the faces of $T$-cell 428 (\ie\ change the value of the horizontal scale factors at $u$- or $v$-point) but 439 429 not the volume of the cells. 440 430 Doing otherwise can lead to numerical instability issues. 441 431 In normal operation the surface areas are computed from $e1u * e2u$ and $e1v * e2v$ but 442 432 in cases where a gridsize reduction is required, 443 the unaltered surface areas at $u$ and $v$ grid points (\texttt{e1e2u} and \texttt{e1e2v}, respectively) must be read or 444 pre-computed in \mdl{usrdef\_hgr}. 445 If these arrays are present in the \np{cn\_domcfg} file they are read and the internal computation is suppressed. 446 Versions of \mdl{usrdef\_hgr} which set their own values of \texttt{e1e2u} and \texttt{e1e2v} should set 447 the surface-area computation flag: 433 the unaltered surface areas at $u$ and $v$ grid points 434 (\texttt{e1e2u} and \texttt{e1e2v}, respectively) must be read or pre-computed in \mdl{usrdef\_hgr}. 435 If these arrays are present in the \np{cn_domcfg}{cn\_domcfg} file they are read and 436 the internal computation is suppressed. 437 Versions of \mdl{usrdef\_hgr} which set their own values of \texttt{e1e2u} and \texttt{e1e2v} should 438 set the surface-area computation flag: 448 439 \texttt{ie1e2u\_v} to a non-zero value to suppress their re-computation. 449 440 450 441 \smallskip 451 442 Similar logic applies to the other optional fields: 452 \texttt{ff\_f} and \texttt{ff\_t} which can be used to provide the Coriolis parameter at F- and T-points respectively if 453 the mesh is not on a sphere. 454 If present these fields will be read and used and the normal calculation ($2 * \Omega * \sin(\varphi)$) suppressed. 455 Versions of \mdl{usrdef\_hgr} which set their own values of \texttt{ff\_f} and \texttt{ff\_t} should set 456 the Coriolis computation flag: 443 \texttt{ff\_f} and \texttt{ff\_t} which can be used to 444 provide the Coriolis parameter at F- and T-points respectively if the mesh is not on a sphere. 445 If present these fields will be read and used and 446 the normal calculation ($2 * \Omega * \sin(\varphi)$) suppressed. 447 Versions of \mdl{usrdef\_hgr} which set their own values of \texttt{ff\_f} and \texttt{ff\_t} should 448 set the Coriolis computation flag: 457 449 \texttt{iff} to a non-zero value to suppress their re-computation. 458 450 459 Note that longitudes, latitudes, and scale factors at $w$ points are exactly equal to those of $t$ points, 460 thus no specific arrays are defined at $w$ points. 461 462 463 % ================================================================ 464 % Domain: Vertical Grid (domzgr) 465 % ================================================================ 466 \subsection[Vertical grid (\textit{domzgr.F90})] 467 {Vertical grid (\protect\mdl{domzgr})} 451 Note that longitudes, latitudes, and scale factors at $w$ points are exactly equal to 452 those of $t$ points, thus no specific arrays are defined at $w$ points. 453 454 %% ================================================================================================= 455 \subsection[Vertical grid (\textit{domzgr.F90})]{Vertical grid (\protect\mdl{domzgr})} 468 456 \label{subsec:DOM_zgr} 469 %-----------------------------------------namdom------------------------------------------- 470 \nlst{namdom} 471 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 457 458 \begin{listing} 459 \nlst{namdom} 460 \caption{\forcode{&namdom}} 461 \label{lst:namdom} 462 \end{listing} 472 463 473 464 In the vertical, the model mesh is determined by four things: 474 465 \begin{enumerate} 475 \item the bathymetry given in meters; 476 \item the number of levels of the model (\jp{jpk}); 477 \item the analytical transformation $z(i,j,k)$ and the vertical scale factors (derivatives of the transformation); and 478 \item the masking system, \ie\ the number of wet model levels at each 479 $(i,j)$ location of the horizontal grid. 466 \item the bathymetry given in meters; 467 \item the number of levels of the model (\jp{jpk}); 468 \item the analytical transformation $z(i,j,k)$ and the vertical scale factors 469 (derivatives of the transformation); and 470 \item the masking system, 471 \ie\ the number of wet model levels at each $(i,j)$ location of the horizontal grid. 480 472 \end{enumerate} 481 473 482 %>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 483 \begin{figure}[!tb] 484 \ begin{center}485 \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{Fig_z_zps_s_sps}486 \caption{487 \protect\label{fig:z_zps_s_sps}488 The ocean bottom as seen by the model:489 (a) $z$-coordinate with full step,490 (b) $z$-coordinate with partial step,491 (c) $s$-coordinate: terrain following representation,492 (d) hybrid $s-z$ coordinate,493 (e) hybrid $s-z$ coordinate with partial step, and494 ( f) same as (e) but in the non-linear free surface (\protect\np{ln\_linssh}\forcode{ = .false.}).495 Note that the non-linear free surface can be used with any of the 5 coordinates (a) to (e).496 497 \ end{center}474 \begin{figure} 475 \centering 476 \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{DOM_z_zps_s_sps} 477 \caption[Ocean bottom regarding coordinate systems ($z$, $s$ and hybrid $s-z$)]{ 478 The ocean bottom as seen by the model: 479 \begin{enumerate*}[label=(\textit{\alph*})] 480 \item $z$-coordinate with full step, 481 \item $z$-coordinate with partial step, 482 \item $s$-coordinate: terrain following representation, 483 \item hybrid $s-z$ coordinate, 484 \item hybrid $s-z$ coordinate with partial step, and 485 \item same as (e) but in the non-linear free surface 486 (\protect\np[=.false.]{ln_linssh}{ln\_linssh}). 487 \end{enumerate*} 488 Note that the non-linear free surface can be used with any of the 5 coordinates (a) to (e).} 489 \label{fig:DOM_z_zps_s_sps} 498 490 \end{figure} 499 %>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>500 491 501 492 The choice of a vertical coordinate is made when setting up the configuration; 502 493 it is not intended to be an option which can be changed in the middle of an experiment. 503 494 The one exception to this statement being the choice of linear or non-linear free surface. 504 In v4.0 the linear free surface option is implemented as a special case of the non-linear free surface. 495 In v4.0 the linear free surface option is implemented as 496 a special case of the non-linear free surface. 505 497 This is computationally wasteful since it uses the structures for time-varying 3D metrics 506 498 for fields that (in the linear free surface case) are fixed. 507 However, the linear free-surface is rarely used and implementing it this way means 508 a single configuration file can support both options. 509 510 By default a non-linear free surface is used (\np{ln\_linssh} set to \forcode{ = .false.} in \nam{dom}): 511 the coordinate follow the time-variation of the free surface so that the transformation is time dependent: 512 $z(i,j,k,t)$ (\eg\ \autoref{fig:z_zps_s_sps}f). 513 When a linear free surface is assumed (\np{ln\_linssh} set to \forcode{ = .true.} in \nam{dom}), 514 the vertical coordinates are fixed in time, but the seawater can move up and down across the $z_0$ surface 499 However, the linear free-surface is rarely used and 500 implementing it this way means a single configuration file can support both options. 501 502 By default a non-linear free surface is used 503 (\np{ln_linssh}{ln\_linssh} set to \forcode{=.false.} in \nam{dom}{dom}): 504 the coordinate follow the time-variation of the free surface so that 505 the transformation is time dependent: $z(i,j,k,t)$ (\eg\ \autoref{fig:DOM_z_zps_s_sps}f). 506 When a linear free surface is assumed 507 (\np{ln_linssh}{ln\_linssh} set to \forcode{=.true.} in \nam{dom}{dom}), 508 the vertical coordinates are fixed in time, but 509 the seawater can move up and down across the $z_0$ surface 515 510 (in other words, the top of the ocean in not a rigid lid). 516 511 517 512 Note that settings: 518 \np{ln\_zco}, \np{ln\_zps}, \np{ln\_sco} and \np{ln\_isfcav} mentioned in the following sections 519 appear to be namelist options but they are no longer truly namelist options for \NEMO. 513 \np{ln_zco}{ln\_zco}, \np{ln_zps}{ln\_zps}, \np{ln_sco}{ln\_sco} and \np{ln_isfcav}{ln\_isfcav} 514 mentioned in the following sections appear to be namelist options but 515 they are no longer truly namelist options for \NEMO. 520 516 Their value is written to and read from the domain configuration file and 521 517 they should be treated as fixed parameters for a particular configuration. 522 They are namelist options for the \texttt{DOMAINcfg} tool that can be used to build the configuration file and523 serve both to provide a record of the choices made whilst building the configuration and 524 to trigger appropriate code blocks within \NEMO.525 These values should not be altered in the \np{cn \_domcfg} file.518 They are namelist options for the \texttt{DOMAINcfg} tool that can be used to 519 build the configuration file and serve both to provide a record of the choices made whilst 520 building the configuration and to trigger appropriate code blocks within \NEMO. 521 These values should not be altered in the \np{cn_domcfg}{cn\_domcfg} file. 526 522 527 523 \medskip 528 The decision on these choices must be made when the \np{cn \_domcfg} file is constructed.529 Three main choices are offered (\autoref{fig: z_zps_s_sps}a-c):524 The decision on these choices must be made when the \np{cn_domcfg}{cn\_domcfg} file is constructed. 525 Three main choices are offered (\autoref{fig:DOM_z_zps_s_sps}a-c): 530 526 531 527 \begin{itemize} 532 \item $z$-coordinate with full step bathymetry (\np {ln\_zco}\forcode{ = .true.}),533 \item $z$-coordinate with partial step ($zps$) bathymetry (\np {ln\_zps}\forcode{ = .true.}),534 \item Generalized, $s$-coordinate (\np {ln\_sco}\forcode{ = .true.}).528 \item $z$-coordinate with full step bathymetry (\np[=.true.]{ln_zco}{ln\_zco}), 529 \item $z$-coordinate with partial step ($zps$) bathymetry (\np[=.true.]{ln_zps}{ln\_zps}), 530 \item Generalized, $s$-coordinate (\np[=.true.]{ln_sco}{ln\_sco}). 535 531 \end{itemize} 536 532 537 533 Additionally, hybrid combinations of the three main coordinates are available: 538 $s-z$ or $s-zps$ coordinate (\autoref{fig: z_zps_s_sps}d and \autoref{fig:z_zps_s_sps}e).534 $s-z$ or $s-zps$ coordinate (\autoref{fig:DOM_z_zps_s_sps}d and \autoref{fig:DOM_z_zps_s_sps}e). 539 535 540 536 A further choice related to vertical coordinate concerns 541 537 the presence (or not) of ocean cavities beneath ice shelves within the model domain. 542 A setting of \np{ln\_isfcav} as \forcode{.true.} indicates that the domain contains ocean cavities, 538 A setting of \np{ln_isfcav}{ln\_isfcav} as \forcode{.true.} indicates that 539 the domain contains ocean cavities, 543 540 otherwise the top, wet layer of the ocean will always be at the ocean surface. 544 541 This option is currently only available for $z$- or $zps$-coordinates. 545 542 In the latter case, partial steps are also applied at the ocean/ice shelf interface. 546 543 547 Within the model, the arrays describing the grid point depths and vertical scale factors are three set of 548 three dimensional arrays $(i,j,k)$ defined at \textit{before}, \textit{now} and \textit{after} time step. 544 Within the model, 545 the arrays describing the grid point depths and vertical scale factors are 546 three set of three dimensional arrays $(i,j,k)$ defined at 547 \textit{before}, \textit{now} and \textit{after} time step. 549 548 The time at which they are defined is indicated by a suffix: $\_b$, $\_n$, or $\_a$, respectively. 550 549 They are updated at each model time step. 551 550 The initial fixed reference coordinate system is held in variable names with a $\_0$ suffix. 552 When the linear free surface option is used (\np {ln\_linssh}\forcode{ = .true.}),551 When the linear free surface option is used (\np[=.true.]{ln_linssh}{ln\_linssh}), 553 552 \textit{before}, \textit{now} and \textit{after} arrays are initially set to 554 553 their reference counterpart and remain fixed. 555 554 555 %% ================================================================================================= 556 556 \subsubsection{Required fields} 557 557 \label{sec:DOM_zgr_fields} … … 572 572 \end{clines} 573 573 574 This set of vertical metrics is sufficient to describe the initial depth and thickness of every gridcell in575 the model regardless of the choice of vertical coordinate.574 This set of vertical metrics is sufficient to describe the initial depth and thickness of 575 every gridcell in the model regardless of the choice of vertical coordinate. 576 576 With constant z-levels, e3 metrics will be uniform across each horizontal level. 577 577 In the partial step case each e3 at the \jp{bottom\_level} … … 579 579 may vary from its horizontal neighbours. 580 580 And, in s-coordinates, variations can occur throughout the water column. 581 With the non-linear free-surface, all the coordinates behave more like the s-coordinate in 582 thatvariations occur throughout the water column with displacements related to the sea surface height.581 With the non-linear free-surface, all the coordinates behave more like the s-coordinate in that 582 variations occur throughout the water column with displacements related to the sea surface height. 583 583 These variations are typically much smaller than those arising from bottom fitted coordinates. 584 584 The values for vertical metrics supplied in the domain configuration file can be considered as 585 585 those arising from a flat sea surface with zero elevation. 586 586 587 The \jp{bottom\_level} and \jp{top\_level} 2D arrays define the \jp{bottom\_level} and top wet levels in each grid column. 587 The \jp{bottom\_level} and \jp{top\_level} 2D arrays define 588 the \jp{bottom\_level} and top wet levels in each grid column. 588 589 Without ice cavities, \jp{top\_level} is essentially a land mask (0 on land; 1 everywhere else). 589 590 With ice cavities, \jp{top\_level} determines the first wet point below the overlying ice shelf. 590 591 591 592 % ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 593 % level bathymetry and mask 594 % ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 592 %% ================================================================================================= 595 593 \subsubsection{Level bathymetry and mask} 596 594 \label{subsec:DOM_msk} 597 595 598 599 596 From \jp{top\_level} and \jp{bottom\_level} fields, the mask fields are defined as follows: 600 \begin{alignat*}{2} 601 tmask(i,j,k) &= & & 602 \begin{cases} 603 0 &\text{if $ k < top\_level(i,j)$} \\ 604 1 &\text{if $bottom\_level(i,j) \leq k \leq top\_level(i,j)$} \\ 605 0 &\text{if $ k > bottom\_level(i,j)$} 606 \end{cases} 607 \\ 608 umask(i,j,k) &= & &tmask(i,j,k) * tmask(i + 1,j, k) \\ 609 vmask(i,j,k) &= & &tmask(i,j,k) * tmask(i ,j + 1,k) \\ 610 fmask(i,j,k) &= & &tmask(i,j,k) * tmask(i + 1,j, k) \\ 611 & &* &tmask(i,j,k) * tmask(i + 1,j, k) \\ 612 wmask(i,j,k) &= & &tmask(i,j,k) * tmask(i ,j,k - 1) \\ 613 \text{with~} wmask(i,j,1) &= & &tmask(i,j,1) 614 \end{alignat*} 597 \begin{align*} 598 tmask(i,j,k) &= 599 \begin{cases} 600 0 &\text{if $ k < top\_level(i,j)$} \\ 601 1 &\text{if $ bottom\_level(i,j) \leq k \leq top\_level(i,j)$} \\ 602 0 &\text{if $k > bottom\_level(i,j) $} 603 \end{cases} \\ 604 umask(i,j,k) &= tmask(i,j,k) * tmask(i + 1,j, k) \\ 605 vmask(i,j,k) &= tmask(i,j,k) * tmask(i ,j + 1,k) \\ 606 fmask(i,j,k) &= tmask(i,j,k) * tmask(i + 1,j, k) * tmask(i,j,k) * tmask(i + 1,j, k) \\ 607 wmask(i,j,k) &= tmask(i,j,k) * tmask(i ,j,k - 1) \\ 608 \text{with~} wmask(i,j,1) &= tmask(i,j,1) 609 \end{align*} 615 610 616 611 Note that, without ice shelves cavities, 617 masks at $t-$ and $w-$points are identical with the numerical indexing used (\autoref{subsec:DOM_Num_Index}). 618 Nevertheless, $wmask$ are required with ocean cavities to deal with the top boundary (ice shelf/ocean interface) 612 masks at $t-$ and $w-$points are identical with the numerical indexing used 613 (\autoref{subsec:DOM_Num_Index}). 614 Nevertheless, 615 $wmask$ are required with ocean cavities to deal with the top boundary (ice shelf/ocean interface) 619 616 exactly in the same way as for the bottom boundary. 620 617 … … 625 622 %% (see \autoref{fig:LBC_jperio}). 626 623 627 628 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------629 624 % Closed seas 630 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 631 \subsection{Closed seas} \label{subsec:DOM_closea} 632 633 When a global ocean is coupled to an atmospheric model it is better to represent all large water bodies 634 (\eg\ Great Lakes, Caspian sea \dots) even if the model resolution does not allow their communication with 635 the rest of the ocean. 625 %% ================================================================================================= 626 \subsection{Closed seas} 627 \label{subsec:DOM_closea} 628 629 When a global ocean is coupled to an atmospheric model it is better to 630 represent all large water bodies (\eg\ Great Lakes, Caspian sea, \dots) even if 631 the model resolution does not allow their communication with the rest of the ocean. 636 632 This is unnecessary when the ocean is forced by fixed atmospheric conditions, 637 633 so these seas can be removed from the ocean domain. 638 The user has the option to set the bathymetry in closed seas to zero (see \autoref{sec:MISC_closea}) and 639 to optionally decide on the fate of any freshwater imbalance over the area. 640 The options are explained in \autoref{sec:MISC_closea} but it should be noted here that 641 a successful use of these options requires appropriate mask fields to be present in the domain configuration file. 634 The user has the option to 635 set the bathymetry in closed seas to zero (see \autoref{sec:MISC_closea}) and to 636 optionally decide on the fate of any freshwater imbalance over the area. 637 The options are explained in \autoref{sec:MISC_closea} but 638 it should be noted here that a successful use of these options requires 639 appropriate mask fields to be present in the domain configuration file. 642 640 Among the possibilities are: 643 641 644 642 \begin{clines} 645 int closea_mask /* non-zero values in closed sea areas for optional masking*/646 int closea_mask_rnf /* non-zero values in closed sea areas with runoff locations (precip only)*/647 int closea_mask_emp /* non-zero values in closed sea areas with runoff locations (total emp)*/643 int closea_mask /* non-zero values in closed sea areas for optional masking */ 644 int closea_mask_rnf /* non-zero values in closed sea areas with runoff locations (precip only) */ 645 int closea_mask_emp /* non-zero values in closed sea areas with runoff locations (total emp) */ 648 646 \end{clines} 649 647 650 % ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 651 % Grid files 652 % ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 648 %% ================================================================================================= 653 649 \subsection{Output grid files} 654 650 \label{subsec:DOM_meshmask} 655 651 656 \nlst{namcfg}657 658 652 Most of the arrays relating to a particular ocean model configuration discussed in this chapter 659 (grid-point position, scale factors) 660 can be saved in a file if 661 namelist parameter \np{ln\_write\_cfg} (namelist \nam{cfg}) is set to\forcode{.true.};662 the output filename is set through parameter \np{cn \_domcfg\_out}.653 (grid-point position, scale factors) can be saved in a file if 654 namelist parameter \np{ln_write_cfg}{ln\_write\_cfg} (namelist \nam{cfg}{cfg}) is set to 655 \forcode{.true.}; 656 the output filename is set through parameter \np{cn_domcfg_out}{cn\_domcfg\_out}. 663 657 This is only really useful if 664 658 the fields are computed in subroutines \mdl{usrdef\_hgr} or \mdl{usrdef\_zgr} and 665 659 checking or confirmation is required. 666 660 667 \nlst{namdom}668 669 661 Alternatively, all the arrays relating to a particular ocean model configuration 670 (grid-point position, scale factors, depths and masks) 671 can be saved in a file called \texttt{mesh\_mask} if 672 namelist parameter \np{ln\_meshmask} (namelist \nam{dom}) is set to \forcode{.true.}. 662 (grid-point position, scale factors, depths and masks) can be saved in 663 a file called \texttt{mesh\_mask} if 664 namelist parameter \np{ln_meshmask}{ln\_meshmask} (namelist \nam{dom}{dom}) is set to 665 \forcode{.true.}. 673 666 This file contains additional fields that can be useful for post-processing applications. 674 667 675 % 676 % Domain: Initial State (dtatsd & istate) 677 % ================================================================ 678 \section[Initial state (\textit{istate.F90} and \textit{dtatsd.F90})] 679 {Initial state (\protect\mdl{istate} and \protect\mdl{dtatsd})}680 \label{sec:DTA_tsd}681 %-----------------------------------------namtsd------------------------------------------- 682 \nlst{namtsd}683 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 684 685 Basic initial state options are defined in \nam{tsd} .668 %% ================================================================================================= 669 \section[Initial state (\textit{istate.F90} and \textit{dtatsd.F90})]{Initial state (\protect\mdl{istate} and \protect\mdl{dtatsd})} 670 \label{sec:DOM_DTA_tsd} 671 672 \begin{listing} 673 \nlst{namtsd} 674 \caption{\forcode{&namtsd}} 675 \label{lst:namtsd} 676 \end{listing} 677 678 Basic initial state options are defined in \nam{tsd}{tsd}. 686 679 By default, the ocean starts from rest (the velocity field is set to zero) and 687 the initialization of temperature and salinity fields is controlled through the \np{ln \_tsd\_init} namelist parameter.680 the initialization of temperature and salinity fields is controlled through the \np{ln_tsd_init}{ln\_tsd\_init} namelist parameter. 688 681 689 682 \begin{description} 690 \item[\np{ln\_tsd\_init}\forcode{= .true.}] 691 Use T and S input files that can be given on the model grid itself or on their native input data grids. 692 In the latter case, the data will be interpolated on-the-fly both in the horizontal and the vertical to the model grid 683 \item [{\np[=.true.]{ln_tsd_init}{ln\_tsd\_init}}] Use T and S input files that can be given on 684 the model grid itself or on their native input data grids. 685 In the latter case, 686 the data will be interpolated on-the-fly both in the horizontal and the vertical to the model grid 693 687 (see \autoref{subsec:SBC_iof}). 694 The information relating to the input files are specified in the \np{sn\_tem} and \np{sn\_sal} structures. 688 The information relating to the input files are specified in 689 the \np{sn_tem}{sn\_tem} and \np{sn_sal}{sn\_sal} structures. 695 690 The computation is done in the \mdl{dtatsd} module. 696 \item [\np{ln\_tsd\_init}\forcode{= .false.}]697 Initial values for T and S are set viaa user supplied \rou{usr\_def\_istate} routine contained in \mdl{userdef\_istate}.691 \item [{\np[=.false.]{ln_tsd_init}{ln\_tsd\_init}}] Initial values for T and S are set via 692 a user supplied \rou{usr\_def\_istate} routine contained in \mdl{userdef\_istate}. 698 693 The default version sets horizontally uniform T and profiles as used in the GYRE configuration 699 (see \autoref{sec:CFG _gyre}).694 (see \autoref{sec:CFGS_gyre}). 700 695 \end{description} 701 696 702 \biblio 703 704 \pindex 697 \onlyinsubfile{\input{../../global/epilogue}} 705 698 706 699 \end{document}
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.