Opened 4 years ago
Last modified 3 years ago
#2379 new Task
VALID-11_clevy_OASIS_TESTCASE
| Reported by: | clevy | Owned by: | clevy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | Unscheduled |
| Component: | SBC | Version: | trunk |
| Severity: | minor | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | emalod, coquart |
Description
Workplan action
Commit History (3)
| Changeset | Author | Time | ChangeLog |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13242 | clevy | 2020-07-03T17:33:16+02:00 | Update vlaidation script and READN for CPL_OASIS test case, see #2379 |
| 12669 | clevy | 2020-04-03T17:21:52+02:00 | Update TOYATM for future NEMO release, see #2379 |
| 12663 | clevy | 2020-04-03T15:01:04+02:00 | Add CPL_OASIS test case, see #2379 |
Attachments (1)
Change History (11)
comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by timgraham
- Cc timgraham added
Changed 4 years ago by emalod
comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by emalod
comment:3 Changed 4 years ago by emalod
- wp_comment changed from Preview to Preview: OK
comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by clevy
- Cc coquart added; timgraham removed
comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by clevy
In 12663:
comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by clevy
In 12669:
comment:7 Changed 4 years ago by clevy
In 12710:
comment:8 Changed 4 years ago by smasson
In 13201:
comment:9 Changed 4 years ago by clevy
In 13242:
comment:10 Changed 3 years ago by nemo
- Milestone changed from 2020 WP to Unscheduled
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Preview from L. Coquart and E. Maisonnave (CERFACS)
We validate Claire's workplan as described in the wikipage with the following remarks:
1- The described configuration was successfully assembled, compiled and executed on the CERFACS Intel Skylake computer. The different steps are described in the attached document README_TOYATM_NEMO_12022020.txt
2- STEP 1: we propose to rename CPL_TOYATM configuration removing TOYATM from the name, to avoid confusion between the coupled configuration of NEMO and the TOYATM executable. We agree in saving the NEMO configuration in tests/ and the toy in tools/. We suggest to provide a reference ATSSTSST_toyatm_01.nc file (which includes the SST coupling fields) that would be compared with the newly produced coupling field for validation. The similarity of a simple spatial average should validate the coupled implementation. Concerning validation, we propose to share the work between CERFACS and the NEMO consortium: the same validation procedure can be done by CERFACS at any OASIS release and by the NEMO consortium at any NEMO release. CERFACS' validation would be done using the last NEMO release, and not the trunk.
3- STEP 2: we propose to keep the validation as it is for the moment. The NEMO configuration includes SI3 and TOP-PISCES, even though these modules are not explicitly coupled. We propose to validate the ocean-atmosphere interface only, as a starting point.
4- STEP 3: we propose to start from CERFACS' testcase to build NEMO testcase (see attached files and previous comments)