Version 4 (modified by jryder, 8 years ago) (diff) |
---|
Description of the sub-grid representation
The following open wiki document outlines proposed developments to the sechiba module that will allow for the separate representation of PFTs (or of groups of PFTs) within each grid square (link to sub-grid options in ORCHIDEE-CAN). Please feel free to post thoughts and questions.
This developement is motivated in part by research regarding differences in modelled characteristics when the 'mosaic' approach is applied within grid cells. (Li & Arora, 2012; Melton & Arora, 2014) found that although there were differences of only 5% between grid averaged heat fluxes between the mosaic approach and composite approach are compared, differences of 30-40% were observed for grid averaged NPP, LAI, soil Carbon and vegetagion biomass. For high within-cell heterogeneity, differences were much greater in both instances. The mosaic versus composite effect has yet to be tested in a model on a global scale.
Attachments (7)
-
bg-11-1021-2014.pdf
(1.5 MB) -
added by jryder 8 years ago.
Melton & Arora (2014), Sub-grid scale representation of vegetation in global land surface schemes: implications for estimation of the terrestrial carbon sink
-
Li, Arora - 2012 - Effect of mosaic representation of vegetation in land surface schemes on simulated energy and carbon balances.pdf
(1010.0 KB) -
added by jryder 8 years ago.
Li & Arora (2012), 'Effect of mosaic representation of vegetation in land surface schemes on simulated energy and carbon balances'
- retrait_slides_revision.009.png (107.7 KB) - added by jryder 8 years ago.
- variable_amalgamate_flowchart.pdf (22.8 KB) - added by jryder 8 years ago.
- Diagram_090216c.png (454.9 KB) - added by jryder 8 years ago.
- office-icons-document-free-stock-vector.jpg (21.4 KB) - added by jryder 8 years ago.
-
290316 copy.pdf
(1.3 MB) -
added by jryder 8 years ago.
outline_presentation