Opened 2 years ago
Last modified 2 years ago
#2748 assigned Request
Physical significance of TKE penetration not scaled by the model time step ?
Reported by: | jchanut | Owned by: | systeam |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | low | Milestone: | |
Component: | ZDF | Version: | trunk |
Severity: | minor | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description
Context
On TKE additional source term (e.g. nn_etau>0 in namzdf_tke)
Analysis
The additional TKE source term in zdftke is not scaled by the model time step:
IF( nn_etau == 1 ) THEN !* penetration below the mixed layer (rn_efr fraction) DO_3D_OVR( nn_hls-1, nn_hls-1, nn_hls-1, nn_hls-1, 2, jpkm1 ) en(ji,jj,jk) = en(ji,jj,jk) + rn_efr * en(ji,jj,1) * EXP( -gdepw(ji,jj,jk,Kmm) / htau(ji,jj) ) & & * MAX( 0._wp, 1._wp - zice_fra(ji,jj) ) * wmask(ji,jj,jk) * tmask(ji,jj,1)
As expected, this leads to a dependency of the tke profiles, hence of viscosities/diffusivities on the chosen time step. This may well be on purpose, but I have trouble to see the physical motivation behind that. I would rather have seen a kind of time scale associated with that process (in place of the surface tke fraction) and then multiplied by the time step.
Recommendation
At this point, I would like to be convinced :)
Commit History (0)
(No commits)
Change History (1)
comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by nemo
- Owner set to systeam
- Status changed from new to assigned
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.